Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures 20 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.019  0.093 0.079 0.155 0.155 - 0
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.022  0.156 0.067 0.149 0.149 - 0
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.022  0.225 0.087 0.175 0.175 - 0
4 SmartOS  0:00:00  0.026  0.092 0.067 0.136 0.136 - 0
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.030  0.138 0.062 0.127 0.127 - 0
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.037  0.188 0.066 0.128 0.261 307 41
7 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.037  0.137 0.073 0.143 0.189 367 17
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.056  0.222 0.076 0.157 0.542 77 30
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.067  0.170 0.074 0.159 0.208 304 15
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.108  0.199 0.128 0.253 0.383 125 16
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.131  0.132 0.011 0.199 0.199 - 0
12 FreeBSD  0:29:07  0.134  0.230 0.020 0.044 0.134 586 53
13 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.138  0.127 0.085 0.177 0.961 92 72
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.157  0.148 0.088 0.292 0.607 147 46
15 Linux  0:15:03  0.191  0.139 0.104 0.207 0.207 - -
16 Linux  9:38:40  1.341  0.237 0.108 0.194 0.196 - 0
 

Report from 1-Oct-2014 00:00 till 31-Oct-2014 23:59

Generated on 5-Dec-2019 14:55

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the individual web server, though it is possible to sort by other columns by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/vXtream and Amsterdam/Webair. Sites located near one of our collectors may have an advantage over others listed in the table, though this effect is mitigated by using averages collected from multiple points. Sites exclusively hosted in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Sites using a Content Distribution Network, such as Akamai, have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the node closest to each performance collector.

More information can be found in the FAQ.