Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures 28 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.266 0.042 0.086 0.180 126 17
2 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.319 0.055 0.113 0.248 108 20
3 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.005  1.101 0.040 0.081 0.208 105 17
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.010  1.310 0.044 0.096 0.140 91 5
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.014  0.291 0.120 0.361 0.734 68 23
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.034  1.288 0.045 0.091 0.091 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.082  0.734 0.056 0.133 0.663 263 216
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.086  1.499 0.101 0.203 0.411 73 14
9 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.130  1.317 0.129 0.265 0.826 103 57
10 Linux  0:00:34  0.187  0.617 0.096 0.315 0.472 310 17
11 Linux  0:05:08  0.197  3.241 0.029 0.068 0.511 56 30
 

Report from 1-May-2009 00:01 till 31-May-2009 23:54

Generated on 22-Nov-2017 13:02

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the individual web server, though it is possible to sort by other columns by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Virginia/Rackspace, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Pennsylvania/INetU-2 and Phoenix/GoDaddy. Sites located near one of our collectors may have an advantage over others listed in the table, though this effect is mitigated by using averages collected from multiple points. Sites exclusively hosted in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Sites using a Content Distribution Network, such as Akamai, have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the node closest to each performance collector.

More information can be found in the FAQ.