Hosting Providers sites ordered by average first byte time 29 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.975  0.122 0.050 0.102 0.102 - 0
2 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.014  0.133 0.070 0.137 0.184 360 17
3 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.031  0.140 0.069 0.141 0.442 116 35
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.021  0.111 0.074 0.146 0.291 227 33
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.007  0.089 0.073 0.146 0.146 - 0
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.017  0.289 0.072 0.147 0.228 277 22
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.024  0.072 0.074 0.149 0.295 148 22
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.045  0.211 0.073 0.153 0.345 188 36
9 unknown  0:00:00  0.393  0.196 0.078 0.161 0.320 49 8
10 Linux  0:00:00  1.149  0.227 0.082 0.162 0.215 206 11
11 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.049  0.238 0.081 0.164 0.513 75 26
12 Linux  0:00:00  1.160  0.226 0.084 0.175 0.230 241 13
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.073  0.249 0.087 0.189 0.189 - 0
14 Linux  0:22:19  0.108  0.226 0.097 0.195 0.195 - 0
15 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.167  0.131 0.099 0.204 0.923 79 57
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.017  0.209 0.129 0.214 0.517 133 40
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.024  0.162 0.109 0.215 0.547 49 16
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.024  0.228 0.076 0.371 0.531 123 20
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.192  0.359 0.116 0.441 0.927 152 74
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.028  0.262 0.098 0.476 0.754 80 22
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.181  0.117 0.082 0.546 0.767 149 33
 

Report from 1-Jun-2013 00:00 till 30-Jun-2013 23:59

Generated on 21-Oct-2017 13:54

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the individual web server, though it is possible to sort by other columns by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Vancouver/Peer1, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/vXtream and Amsterdam/Webair. Sites located near one of our collectors may have an advantage over others listed in the table, though this effect is mitigated by using averages collected from multiple points. Sites exclusively hosted in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Sites using a Content Distribution Network, such as Akamai, have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the node closest to each performance collector.

More information can be found in the FAQ.