Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures 33 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.007  0.132 0.071 0.142 0.142 - 0
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.007  0.331 0.132 0.388 0.668 112 20
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.017  0.143 0.117 0.236 0.600 52 16
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.020  0.371 0.097 0.200 0.282 246 11
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.020  0.349 0.120 0.577 0.577 - 0
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.024  0.127 0.071 0.141 0.285 123 17
7 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.024  0.239 0.096 0.194 0.596 80 26
8 unknown  0:00:00  0.030  0.142 0.088 0.177 0.570 118 35
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.034  0.223 0.083 0.168 0.736 72 41
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.034  0.418 0.138 1.005 1.551 186 83
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.037  0.124 0.115 0.229 0.457 192 31
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.040  0.090 0.087 0.176 0.352 109 20
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.040  0.720 0.089 0.184 0.260 252 11
14 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.040  0.208 0.098 0.195 0.209 383 2
15 unknown  0:00:00  0.054  0.134 0.085 0.170 0.349 99 23
16 Linux  0:09:37  0.094  0.305 0.081 0.162 0.162 - 0
17 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.111  0.133 0.116 0.233 0.958 68 51
18 Linux  0:10:49  0.202  0.106 0.072 0.531 0.763 176 32
19 Linux  0:35:21  0.452  0.278 0.097 0.196 0.196 - 0
20 Linux  0:53:47  1.062  0.385 0.068 0.149 0.318 190 34
 

Report from 30-Sep-2012 23:00 till 31-Oct-2012 23:59

Generated on 26-Feb-2017 14:41

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the individual web server, though it is possible to sort by other columns by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Virginia/Rackspace, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Vancouver/Peer1, Romania/Hostway and Zurich/Qube. Sites located near one of our collectors may have an advantage over others listed in the table, though this effect is mitigated by using averages collected from multiple points. Sites exclusively hosted in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Sites using a Content Distribution Network, such as Akamai, have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the node closest to each performance collector.

More information can be found in the FAQ.