Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures 44 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.007  0.094 0.018 0.037 0.056 463 9
2 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.010  0.012 0.064 0.142 0.337 115 30
3 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.014  0.254 0.083 0.169 0.507 81 26
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.017  0.419 0.067 0.552 0.697 111 20
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.021  0.157 0.119 0.242 0.498 95 23
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.024  0.017 0.031 0.063 0.063 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.028  0.447 0.119 0.888 1.461 177 78
8 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.031  0.122 0.077 0.238 0.463 131 29
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.035  0.066 0.062 0.124 0.124 - 0
10 unknown  0:00:00  0.038  0.163 0.072 0.145 0.145 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.042  0.062 0.053 0.107 0.233 200 31
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.042  0.067 0.091 0.257 0.257 - 0
13 unknown  0:00:00  0.045  0.110 0.030 0.073 0.179 190 34
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.049  0.075 0.046 0.356 0.482 237 30
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.049  0.154 0.148 0.303 0.742 52 16
16 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.070  0.162 0.074 0.149 0.152 223 1
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.070  0.187 0.120 0.872 1.244 114 41
18 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.073  0.044 0.060 0.114 0.220 128 20
19 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.084  0.109 0.104 0.209 0.863 69 51
20 unknown  0:01:46  0.101  0.074 0.068 0.731 1.060 124 35
21 Linux  0:01:28  0.108  0.129 0.108 0.235 0.365 168 18
22 Linux  0:05:24  0.108  0.074 0.069 0.142 0.290 177 26
23 unknown  0:00:00  0.195  0.257 0.091 0.403 0.776 187 64
24 Linux  0:20:36  0.212  0.119 0.118 0.246 0.493 151 25
25 FreeBSD  0:23:17  0.212  0.043 0.042 0.095 0.409 165 17
26 unknown  0:00:00  0.216  0.136 0.063 0.388 0.388 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.261  0.032 0.027 0.055 0.055 - 0
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.289  0.089 0.063 0.308 0.493 151 32
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.306  0.234 0.090 0.341 0.584 192 47
30 unknown  0:00:00  0.331  0.035 0.003 0.587 0.620 1066 47
31 Linux  2:00:00  0.397  0.209 0.075 0.154 0.218 218 11
32 unknown  0:00:00  0.480  0.284 0.023 0.344 0.507 813 99
33 Linux  2:27:14  0.515  0.181 0.078 0.160 0.233 216 11
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.616  0.122 0.046 0.273 0.522 241 90
35 Linux  1:12:49  1.786  0.179 0.079 0.161 0.697 66 35
 

Report from 1-Nov-2012 00:00 till 1-Dec-2012 00:00

Generated on 1-Sep-2014 13:47

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Virginia/Rackspace, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Vancouver/Peer1, Romania/Hostway and Zurich/Qube. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.