Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures 30 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.014  0.254 0.083 0.169 0.507 81 26
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.017  0.419 0.067 0.552 0.697 111 20
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.024  0.017 0.031 0.063 0.063 - 0
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.028  0.447 0.119 0.888 1.461 177 78
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.038  0.163 0.072 0.145 0.145 - 0
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.042  0.062 0.053 0.107 0.233 200 31
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.042  0.067 0.091 0.257 0.257 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.045  0.110 0.030 0.073 0.179 190 34
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.049  0.154 0.148 0.303 0.742 52 16
10 unknown  0:00:00  0.070  0.162 0.074 0.149 0.152 223 1
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.073  0.044 0.060 0.114 0.220 128 20
12 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.084  0.109 0.104 0.209 0.863 69 51
13 FreeBSD  0:01:46  0.101  0.074 0.068 0.731 1.060 124 35
14 unknown  0:23:17  0.212  0.043 0.042 0.095 0.409 165 17
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.261  0.032 0.027 0.055 0.055 - 0
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.289  0.089 0.063 0.308 0.493 151 32
17 Linux  2:00:00  0.397  0.209 0.075 0.154 0.218 218 11
18 Linux  2:27:14  0.515  0.181 0.078 0.160 0.233 216 11
19 Linux  1:12:49  1.786  0.179 0.079 0.161 0.697 66 35
 

Report from 1-Nov-2012 00:00 till 30-Nov-2012 23:59

Generated on 22-Jun-2017 18:34

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the individual web server, though it is possible to sort by other columns by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Virginia/Rackspace, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Vancouver/Peer1, Romania/Hostway and Zurich/Qube. Sites located near one of our collectors may have an advantage over others listed in the table, though this effect is mitigated by using averages collected from multiple points. Sites exclusively hosted in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Sites using a Content Distribution Network, such as Akamai, have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the node closest to each performance collector.

More information can be found in the FAQ.