Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures 33 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.011  0.300 0.053 0.107 0.107 - 0
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.018  0.461 0.071 0.145 0.156 269 10
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.021  0.096 0.034 0.074 0.223 101 23
4 unknown  0:00:00  0.021  0.762 0.068 0.137 0.342 99 17
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.029  0.425 0.086 0.172 0.474 54 16
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.029  0.211 0.090 0.179 0.179 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.036  0.198 0.082 0.168 0.465 98 33
8 unknown  0:00:00  0.039  0.282 0.080 0.181 1.338 271 178
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.046  0.018 0.069 0.140 0.284 103 17
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.050  0.756 0.058 0.240 0.366 92 20
11 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.050  0.158 0.063 0.129 0.375 73 20
12 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.082  0.126 0.088 0.174 0.530 94 50
13 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.104  0.221 0.068 0.175 0.386 205 40
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.179  8.107 0.073 0.148 0.150 175 13
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.293  0.120 0.069 0.332 0.536 121 27
16 Linux  1:53:46  0.536  0.158 0.113 0.232 0.439 171 17
17 Linux  0:00:00  1.447  0.417 0.133 0.269 0.269 - 0
 

Report from 1-Nov-2011 00:00 till 30-Nov-2011 23:59

Generated on 20-Feb-2017 13:21

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the individual web server, though it is possible to sort by other columns by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Virginia/Rackspace, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Vancouver/Peer1, Romania/Hostway and Zurich/Qube. Sites located near one of our collectors may have an advantage over others listed in the table, though this effect is mitigated by using averages collected from multiple points. Sites exclusively hosted in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Sites using a Content Distribution Network, such as Akamai, have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the node closest to each performance collector.

More information can be found in the FAQ.