Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures 22 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.010  0.100 0.038 0.081 0.094 312 12
2 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.010  0.105 0.069 0.140 0.365 106 23
3 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.010  0.130 0.069 0.139 0.308 97 17
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.013  0.152 0.102 0.215 0.424 54 16
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.027  0.029 0.060 0.121 0.245 99 20
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.027  0.156 0.073 0.162 0.377 205 42
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.027  0.239 0.092 0.175 0.468 76 26
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.044  0.210 0.113 0.234 0.436 169 16
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.084  0.154 0.081 0.357 0.787 253 107
10 Linux  0:03:52  0.104  0.234 0.096 0.205 0.205 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:01  0.138  0.442 0.086 0.184 0.376 204 30
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.178  0.194 0.110 0.205 0.523 97 34
13 Windows Server 2012  1:43:17  0.357  0.189 0.097 0.195 4.045 71 50
14 Linux  0:00:00  2.831  3.334 0.134 0.267 0.267 - 0
 

Report from 1-Mar-2012 00:00 till 31-Mar-2012 23:59

Generated on 26-May-2019 18:21

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the individual web server, though it is possible to sort by other columns by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Virginia/Rackspace, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Vancouver/Peer1, Romania/Hostway and Zurich/vXtream. Sites located near one of our collectors may have an advantage over others listed in the table, though this effect is mitigated by using averages collected from multiple points. Sites exclusively hosted in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Sites using a Content Distribution Network, such as Akamai, have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the node closest to each performance collector.

More information can be found in the FAQ.