Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures 42 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order. Click the site name to see graphs of site performance. FAQ Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K) 1 www.nyi.net New York Internet FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.161 0.082 0.166 0.494 137 34 2 www.logicworks.net Logicworks Linux  0:00:00  0.003  0.143 0.082 0.548 0.689 189 28 3 www.netcetera.co.uk Netcetera Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.003  0.109 0.120 0.242 0.604 91 21 4 www.swishmail.com Swishmail FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.007  0.133 0.073 0.147 0.368 84 17 5 www.iWeb8.com iWeb Linux  0:00:00  0.007  0.145 0.082 0.163 0.163 - 0 6 www.datapipe.net Datapipe FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.010  0.151 0.025 0.051 0.077 367 9 7 www.choopa.com www.choopa.com unknown  0:00:00  0.010  0.192 0.093 0.191 0.272 257 11 8 www.memset.com Memset Linux  0:00:00  0.010  0.170 0.124 0.248 0.504 182 31 9 www.reliableservers.com ReliableServers.com Linux  0:00:00  0.013  0.215 0.088 0.180 0.256 241 11 10 www.cwcs.co.uk www.cwcs.co.uk Linux  0:00:00  0.017  0.343 0.137 0.278 1.006 69 39 11 www.multacom.com Multacom FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.024  0.112 0.059 0.118 0.300 52 16 12 krystal.co.uk krystal.co.uk Linux  0:00:00  0.024  0.204 0.109 0.240 0.418 168 16 13 www.leaseweb.com LeaseWeb Linux  0:00:00  0.027  0.370 0.118 0.550 0.550 - 0 14 www.pair.com Pair Networks FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.030  0.239 0.080 0.164 0.506 80 26 15 www.serverintellect.com Server Intellect Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.030  0.159 0.100 0.202 0.503 103 27 16 www.qubenet.net Qube Managed Services Linux  0:00:00  0.030  0.193 0.102 0.206 0.207 7687 5 17 www.rackspace.com Rackspace Linux  0:00:00  0.034  0.196 0.080 0.160 0.160 - 0 18 www.dinahosting.com www.dinahosting.com Linux  0:00:00  0.034  1.235 0.134 0.270 0.271 - 0 19 www.inetu.net INetU Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.040  0.109 0.089 0.264 0.534 133 29 20 www.vi.net Virtual Internet Linux  0:00:00  0.040  0.160 0.102 0.211 0.372 141 21 21 www.godaddy.com GoDaddy.com Inc Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.044  0.329 0.098 0.467 0.907 175 106 22 www.codero.com Codero Linux  0:00:00  0.050  0.235 0.081 0.386 0.737 180 62 23 www.aruba.it www.aruba.it Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.054  0.253 0.147 0.295 1.315 71 50 24 www.kattare.com Kattare Internet Services Linux  0:00:00  0.084  0.153 0.075 0.152 0.308 101 23 25 www.singlehop.com www.singlehop.com Linux  0:00:00  0.131  0.212 0.087 0.373 0.668 182 50 26 www.xilo.net XILO Communications Ltd. Linux  0:00:00  0.151  0.374 0.111 0.341 0.577 107 20 27 www.uk2.net www.uk2.net Linux  0:00:00  0.155  0.185 0.062 0.130 0.205 207 21 28 www.iomarthosting.com Iomart Linux  0:05:38  0.161  0.168 0.123 0.256 0.480 152 25 29 www.webair.com Webair Internet Development FreeBSD  0:49:53  0.282  0.234 0.051 0.118 0.258 165 33 30 www.serverbeach.com www.serverbeach.com Linux  0:13:28  0.299  0.158 0.013 0.642 0.761 388 48 31 www.colocationamerica.com Colocation America Linux  0:12:18  0.457  0.188 0.082 0.712 0.972 92 42 32 one.com One.com Linux  0:19:23  3.766  0.260 0.076 0.152 0.152 - 0 33 www.peer1.com www.peer1.com Linux  0:13:27  3.770  0.163 0.011 6.571 6.837 453 89 Report from 30-Jun-2012 23:00 till 31-Jul-2012 23:59 Generated on 20-Jun-2013 05:05

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are reseaching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Virginia/Rackspace, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Vancouver/Peer1, Romania/Hostway and Zurich/Qube. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.