Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures 30 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.161 0.082 0.166 0.494 137 34
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.003  0.109 0.120 0.242 0.604 91 21
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.007  0.133 0.073 0.147 0.368 84 17
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.010  0.192 0.093 0.191 0.272 257 11
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.010  0.170 0.124 0.248 0.504 182 31
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.013  0.215 0.088 0.180 0.256 241 11
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.017  0.343 0.137 0.278 1.006 69 39
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.024  0.112 0.059 0.118 0.300 52 16
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.024  0.204 0.109 0.240 0.418 168 16
10 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.030  0.239 0.080 0.164 0.506 80 26
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.030  0.193 0.102 0.206 0.207 7687 5
12 unknown  0:00:00  0.034  0.196 0.080 0.160 0.160 - 0
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.034  1.235 0.134 0.270 0.271 - 0
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.044  0.329 0.098 0.467 0.907 175 106
15 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.054  0.253 0.147 0.295 1.315 71 50
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.151  0.374 0.111 0.341 0.577 107 20
17 Linux  0:49:53  0.282  0.234 0.051 0.118 0.258 165 33
18 Linux  0:19:23  3.766  0.260 0.076 0.152 0.152 - 0
 

Report from 1-Jul-2012 00:00 till 31-Jul-2012 23:59

Generated on 24-Jun-2017 07:02

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the individual web server, though it is possible to sort by other columns by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Virginia/Rackspace, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Vancouver/Peer1, Romania/Hostway and Zurich/Qube. Sites located near one of our collectors may have an advantage over others listed in the table, though this effect is mitigated by using averages collected from multiple points. Sites exclusively hosted in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Sites using a Content Distribution Network, such as Akamai, have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the node closest to each performance collector.

More information can be found in the FAQ.