Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures 42 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.039 0.027 0.053 0.054 - 0
2 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.003  0.037 0.025 0.051 0.105 143 17
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.006  0.078 0.025 0.677 0.774 135 35
4 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.009  0.102 0.015 0.032 0.049 463 9
5 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.009  0.092 0.041 0.087 0.294 83 26
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.009  0.183 0.086 0.370 0.747 190 71
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.016  0.206 0.027 0.059 0.065 223 11
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.016  0.036 0.031 0.369 0.450 227 28
9 unknown  0:00:00  0.017  0.138 0.062 0.368 0.368 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.019  0.209 0.092 0.181 0.181 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.022  0.129 0.055 0.109 0.111 2329 3
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.025  0.069 0.059 0.117 0.238 196 31
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.025  0.147 0.101 0.218 0.520 53 16
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.025  0.203 0.115 0.848 1.230 108 42
15 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.028  0.012 0.055 0.112 0.227 133 20
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.028  0.206 0.126 0.253 0.390 158 18
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.031  0.016 0.007 0.015 0.016 - 0
18 unknown  0:00:00  0.031  0.153 0.063 0.126 0.126 - 0
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.031  0.136 0.083 0.299 0.509 201 42
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.041  0.064 0.054 0.108 0.108 - 0
21 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.041  0.078 0.071 0.225 0.423 126 29
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.044  0.101 0.073 0.151 0.219 220 11
23 Linux  0:08:54  0.047  0.128 0.104 0.214 0.431 97 23
24 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.054  0.120 0.100 0.202 0.851 73 53
25 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.057  0.076 0.029 0.058 0.059 310 5
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.057  0.203 0.062 0.348 0.630 166 71
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.066  0.165 0.029 0.073 0.178 177 35
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.069  0.128 0.065 0.544 0.708 112 20
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.120  0.075 0.054 0.322 0.491 167 31
30 Linux  0:17:38  0.170  0.223 0.084 0.171 0.403 170 39
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.249  0.126 0.046 0.226 0.481 256 93
32 Linux  1:22:49  0.431  0.169 0.071 0.145 0.674 64 35
33 unknown  0:00:00  1.373  0.052 0.004 0.679 0.725 984 43
34 unknown  0:00:00  2.386  0.023 0.003 1.724 1.814 889 80
 

Report from 1-Dec-2012 00:00 till 31-Dec-2012 23:59

Generated on 25-Oct-2014 23:38

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Virginia/Rackspace, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Vancouver/Peer1, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.