Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures 44 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order. Click the site name to see graphs of site performance. FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 www.qubenet.net Qube Managed Services Linux  0:00:00  0.003  0.170 0.133 0.270 0.271 5649 5
2 www.datapipe.net Datapipe FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.007  0.079 0.017 0.036 0.054 435 9
3 www.iWeb8.com iWeb Linux  0:00:00  0.007  0.127 0.085 0.170 0.170 - 0
4 www.netcetera.co.uk Netcetera Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.007  0.045 0.139 0.281 0.701 92 22
5 www.xilo.net XILO Communications Ltd. Linux  0:00:00  0.007  0.376 0.141 0.406 0.687 111 20
6 www.reliableservers.com ReliableServers.com Linux  0:00:00  0.010  0.172 0.073 0.180 0.219 250 11
7 www.nyi.net New York Internet FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.013  0.150 0.071 0.223 0.500 126 34
8 www.inetu.net INetU Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.013  0.105 0.093 0.271 0.549 124 26
9 www.serverintellect.com Server Intellect Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.017  0.149 0.055 0.111 0.278 104 28
10 www.choopa.com www.choopa.com Linux  0:00:00  0.020  0.213 0.089 0.183 0.261 256 11
11 www.multacom.com Multacom Linux  0:00:00  0.020  0.132 0.107 0.215 0.542 51 16
12 www.singlehop.com SingleHop Linux  0:00:00  0.024  0.169 0.061 0.178 0.465 195 72
13 www.swishmail.com Swishmail FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.024  0.110 0.071 0.143 0.268 161 17
14 www.logicworks.net Logicworks Linux  0:00:00  0.024  0.102 0.095 0.561 0.768 227 29
15 www.cwcs.co.uk CWCS Linux  0:00:00  0.024  0.259 0.108 0.220 0.875 67 39
16 www.rackspace.com Rackspace F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.027  0.194 0.075 0.151 0.151 - 1
17 www.kattare.com Kattare Internet Services Linux  0:00:00  0.037  0.139 0.117 0.235 0.482 101 23
18 www.godaddy.com GoDaddy.com Inc Linux  0:00:00  0.037  0.495 0.125 1.072 1.652 193 85
19 krystal.co.uk krystal.co.uk Linux  0:00:00  0.040  0.103 0.072 0.167 0.272 170 16
20 www.pair.com Pair Networks FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.051  0.193 0.072 0.147 0.512 81 26
21 www.dinahosting.com www.dinahosting.com Linux  0:00:00  0.051  0.151 0.091 0.184 0.184 - 0
22 www.leaseweb.com LeaseWeb unknown  0:00:00  0.061  0.245 0.080 0.429 0.429 - 0
23 www.hosting4less.com Hosting 4 Less Linux  0:00:00  0.064  0.148 0.104 0.210 0.415 186 26
24 www.memset.com Memset Linux  0:00:00  0.074  0.075 0.072 0.144 0.290 184 31
25 www.aruba.it www.aruba.it Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.077  0.171 0.120 0.242 1.054 70 50
26 www.iomarthosting.com Iomart Linux  0:00:00  0.104  0.107 0.104 0.215 0.413 149 25
27 www.codero.com Codero Linux  0:00:00  0.114  0.249 0.093 0.411 0.814 180 62
28 www.colocationamerica.com Colocation America Linux  0:00:00  0.162  0.168 0.112 0.804 1.152 114 42
29 www.hosteurope.de Host Europe Linux  0:00:00  0.289  0.155 0.088 0.406 0.741 168 56
30 www.webair.com Webair Internet Development FreeBSD  0:36:24  0.421  0.340 0.059 0.134 0.308 173 34
31 www.peer1.com www.peer1.com Linux  0:00:43  3.542  0.166 0.007 0.183 0.308 412 79
32 www.serverbeach.com www.serverbeach.com Linux  0:00:00  3.674  0.175 0.005 0.547 0.605 308 44
33 one.com One.com unknown  0:07:57  5.370  0.296 0.100 0.201 0.201 - 0
Report from 31-Jul-2012 23:02 till 31-Aug-2012 23:59
Generated on 25-Apr-2014 02:12

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Virginia/Rackspace, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Vancouver/Peer1, Romania/Hostway and Zurich/Qube. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.