Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures 30 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.010  0.153 0.041 0.088 0.097 313 12
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.014  0.136 0.071 0.143 0.344 98 17
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.014  0.219 0.130 0.262 0.767 58 16
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.017  0.091 0.034 0.070 0.070 - 0
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.017  0.192 0.081 0.167 0.175 279 11
6 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.017  0.334 0.091 0.185 0.644 79 26
7 unknown  0:00:00  0.021  0.196 0.076 0.161 0.399 213 51
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.028  0.045 0.049 0.100 0.202 118 20
9 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.028  0.125 0.080 0.159 0.444 150 34
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.031  0.198 0.090 0.186 0.726 81 38
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.042  0.112 0.049 0.223 0.347 105 18
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.045  0.093 0.052 0.108 0.205 200 30
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.049  0.215 0.110 0.242 0.440 167 16
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.128  0.409 0.143 0.465 1.116 214 99
15 Linux  0:18:54  0.142  0.495 0.082 0.167 0.167 - 0
16 Linux  0:20:52  0.250  0.283 0.074 0.163 0.379 198 32
17 Windows Server 2012  1:01:47  0.312  0.146 0.081 0.160 0.685 71 50
18 Linux  0:00:00  4.051  2.414 0.123 0.247 0.247 - 0
 

Report from 1-Apr-2012 00:00 till 30-Apr-2012 23:59

Generated on 19-Aug-2017 05:19

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the individual web server, though it is possible to sort by other columns by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Virginia/Rackspace, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Vancouver/Peer1, Romania/Hostway and Zurich/Qube. Sites located near one of our collectors may have an advantage over others listed in the table, though this effect is mitigated by using averages collected from multiple points. Sites exclusively hosted in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Sites using a Content Distribution Network, such as Akamai, have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the node closest to each performance collector.

More information can be found in the FAQ.