Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by OS over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  6.161  0.314 0.090 0.178 0.467 153 44
2 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.213 0.073 0.149 0.535 77 30
3 FreeBSD  0:00:00  3.933  0.216 0.026 0.056 0.150 574 54
4 FreeBSD  0:00:00  3.164  0.121 0.071 0.139 0.185 365 17
5 Linux  0:00:00  1.378  0.116 0.059 0.121 0.121 - 0
6 Linux  0:00:00  9.691  0.142 0.009 0.186 0.186 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.109 0.029 0.046 0.058 703 9
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.239 0.126 0.206 0.209 - -
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.189 0.128 0.286 0.617 72 24
10 Linux  0:00:00  1.379  0.173 0.146 0.260 0.382 133 16
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.171 0.063 0.130 0.271 287 41
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.158 0.072 0.156 0.198 352 15
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.134 0.073 0.176 0.176 - -
14 Linux  0:00:00  1.379  0.229 0.087 0.174 0.174 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.139 0.069 0.146 0.337 301 58
16 Linux  0:00:00  1.151  0.239 0.063 0.126 0.181 221 12
17 Linux  0:00:00  1.724  0.117 0.078 0.166 0.279 314 35
18 Linux  0:00:00  2.283  0.236 0.109 0.220 0.220 - 0
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.263 0.095 0.596 1.046 232 104
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.262 0.104 0.188 0.188 - -
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.099 0.035 0.076 0.076 - 0
22 Linux  0:00:00  1.155  0.149 0.037 0.066 0.066 - 0
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.578  0.091 0.092 0.169 0.170 - 0
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.577  0.136 0.061 0.140 0.140 - 0
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.147 0.071 0.148 0.190 266 11
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.446 0.082 0.167 0.167 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.463  0.239 0.081 0.613 1.598 68 67
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.126 0.075 0.152 0.152 - 0
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.254 0.007 0.032 0.065 1466 49
30 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.169 0.015 1.308 1.423 763 88
31 unknown  0:00:00  0.577  0.247 0.084 0.251 0.251 - 0
32 unknown  0:00:00  1.722  0.149 0.108 0.220 0.220 - -
33 unknown  0:00:00  1.151  0.130 0.013 0.514 0.550 1142 41
34 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.226 0.059 0.117 0.118 2500 3
35 unknown  0:00:00  1.379  0.078 0.012 0.282 0.283 935 1
36 unknown  0:00:00  1.152  0.076 0.062 0.126 0.126 - 0
37 unknown  0:00:00  0.463  0.150 0.102 0.635 0.958 212 68
38 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  2.055  0.127 0.088 0.169 0.971 93 74
39 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.000  0.126 0.076 0.205 0.431 133 30
40 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.463  0.085 0.078 0.160 0.379 109 24
41 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.048 0.081 0.163 0.163 - 0
 

Report from 21-Dec-2014 22:45 till 22-Dec-2014 22:41

Generated on 22-Dec-2014 22:47

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.