Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by average body size over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 39 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.131 0.096 0.185 0.185 - -
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.125 0.008 0.019 0.020 - -
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.216 0.129 0.201 0.201 - -
4 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.131 0.095 0.191 0.191 - -
5 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.053 0.081 0.162 0.162 - 0
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.155 0.063 0.126 0.126 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.122 0.074 0.143 0.143 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.742  0.248 0.015 0.188 0.188 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.082 0.079 0.156 0.156 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.447  0.216 0.009 0.166 0.166 - 0
11 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.207 0.079 0.159 0.159 - 0
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.136 0.081 0.159 0.159 - 0
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.103 0.059 0.121 0.121 - 0
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.111 0.067 0.176 0.176 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.742  0.205 0.080 0.162 0.162 - 0
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.088 0.050 0.101 0.101 - 0
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.593  0.249 0.014 0.168 0.168 - 0
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.421 0.082 0.167 0.168 - 0
19 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.159 0.069 0.229 0.229 - 0
20 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.059 0.063 0.127 0.127 - 0
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.243 0.026 0.055 0.055 - 0
22 Linux  0:00:00  1.183  0.061 0.009 0.171 0.171 23117 1
23 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.102 0.063 0.124 0.125 2716 3
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.087 0.013 0.026 0.036 875 9
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.185 0.106 0.215 0.327 145 16
26 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.118 0.074 0.143 0.179 471 17
27 Linux  0:00:00  2.349  0.078 0.011 0.173 0.377 102 21
28 Linux  0:00:00  2.203  0.158 0.117 0.273 0.592 79 25
29 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.000  0.077 0.076 0.203 0.443 127 30
30 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.109 0.063 0.289 0.416 308 39
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.182 0.010 0.518 0.543 1620 41
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.300 0.009 0.209 0.400 233 45
33 Citrix Netscaler  0:00:00  0.000  0.137 0.095 0.198 0.397 232 46
34 Linux  0:25:01  11.336  0.237 0.082 0.398 0.733 158 53
35 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.189 0.030 0.065 0.209 401 57
36 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.119 0.081 0.169 0.486 188 60
37 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.056 0.064 0.826 1.534 95 67
38 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.182 0.010 1.403 1.514 818 91
39 Linux  0:00:00  0.888  0.082 0.092 0.395 0.718 322 104
 

Report from 1-Jul-2015 08:05 till 2-Jul-2015 08:04

Generated on 2-Jul-2015 08:10

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.