Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 42 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.106 0.012 1.155 1.275 703 85
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.185 0.027 0.054 0.054 - 0
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.104 0.040 0.080 0.080 - 0
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.140 0.060 0.121 0.121 - 0
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.209 0.064 0.129 0.233 230 24
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.148 0.070 0.146 0.341 286 56
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.159 0.072 0.154 0.154 - 0
8 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.226 0.074 0.154 0.536 77 30
9 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.135 0.076 0.143 0.143 - 0
10 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.147 0.076 0.148 0.194 363 17
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.079 0.077 0.151 0.151 - 0
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.156 0.078 0.154 0.154 - 0
13 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.133 0.080 0.167 0.924 96 72
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.251 0.082 0.167 0.167 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.288 0.085 0.387 0.656 80 21
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.200 0.127 0.251 0.519 89 24
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.348  0.337 0.009 0.026 0.061 1379 49
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.348  0.283 0.102 0.612 2.077 44 64
19 unknown  0:00:00  0.463  0.093 0.069 0.142 0.142 - 0
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.463  0.111 0.069 0.157 0.266 316 35
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.463  0.231 0.071 0.141 0.141 - -
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.463  0.142 0.075 0.151 0.194 262 11
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.463  0.269 0.104 0.360 0.798 239 104
24 unknown  0:00:00  0.463  0.125 0.107 0.211 0.211 - -
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.463  0.234 0.133 0.255 0.512 158 41
26 unknown  0:00:00  0.578  0.115 0.012 0.491 0.527 1162 41
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.578  0.126 0.076 0.184 0.184 - -
28 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.579  0.119 0.019 0.037 0.055 477 9
29 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.579  0.161 0.084 0.221 0.476 135 34
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.216 0.102 0.187 0.191 - -
31 unknown  0:00:00  0.694  0.109 0.029 0.222 0.223 931 1
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.694  0.159 0.072 0.152 0.200 311 15
33 unknown  0:00:00  0.924  0.191 0.109 0.902 1.241 193 66
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.924  0.182 0.111 0.230 0.553 204 66
35 unknown  0:00:00  1.149  0.137 0.090 0.252 0.252 - 0
36 Linux  0:00:00  1.151  0.238 0.061 0.120 0.121 2617 3
37 Linux  0:00:00  1.151  0.206 0.067 0.128 0.263 303 41
38 Linux  0:00:00  1.151  0.186 0.113 0.229 0.345 140 16
39 unknown  0:00:00  1.378  0.210 0.015 0.032 0.095 842 53
40 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  1.378  0.150 0.098 0.325 0.651 142 46
41 Linux  0:00:00  2.055  0.122 0.009 0.183 0.183 - 0
42 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  4.489  0.101 0.079 0.156 0.379 102 23
 

Report from 22-Oct-2014 11:40 till 23-Oct-2014 11:32

Generated on 23-Oct-2014 11:43

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.