Whats that site running?
Netcraft Services
Sites on the Move
Today's changes
Last week
Last Month
Internet Exploration
Netcraft Toolbar
What's that site running?
Search Web by Domain
Internet Data Mining
Hosting Provider Switching Analysis
Hosting Provider Server Count
Hosting Reseller Survey
SSL Survey
Web Server Survey Archive
Performance
Hosting Providers' Network Performance
Dedicated Server Monitoring
Security
Anti-Phishing Toolbar
Automated Security Testing
Dedicated Server Monitoring
Web Application Testing & Site Audits
Security Services FAQ
Uptime
Longest uptimes
Most requested sites
Advertising
Banner Advertising on Netcraft
About Netcraft
About Netcraft
Jobs at Netcraft
Fair Use, Copyright
Site Privacy Statement
Visiting Netcraft
Contact Us
Webmaster
Hosting Providers gaining most sites over the last 7 days
generated on 16-Mar-2010 16:38:56 updated daily
Rank Netblock New Gains Losses Net change
1 Go Daddy Software, Inc. 8923 193 158 8958
2 OVH 4204 219 228 4195
3 1 & 1 Internet 2721 92 217 2596
4 ThePlanet.com Internet Services 2201 379 289 2291
5 1744 W. Katella Avenue. 796 1389 120 2065
6 Strato Rechenzentrum, Berlin 1334 162 7 1489
7 Ecommerce Corporation 1003 30 12 1021
8 Neue Medien Muennich 822 45 1 866
9 Google Inc 660 79 64 675
10 Choopa, LLC 667 21 19 669
11 SoftLayer Technologies Inc. 615 151 161 605
12 Bluehost.com 497 61 20 538
13 Comite Gestor da Internet no Brasil 381 37 31 387
14 New Dream Network, LLC 208 79 8 279
15 Hetzner Online AG 233 48 5 276
16 SHARED WEBHOSTING 207 25 - 232
17 1&1 Internet Inc. 175 51 7 219
18 Strato Medien AG 360 44 189 215
19 SingleHop, Inc. 170 55 19 206
20 ValueSERVER 187 - - 187
21 Global Net Access, LLC 192 32 41 183
22 Hosteurope GmbH 174 10 3 181
23 UNITED DOMAINS AG 172 6 3 175
24 GoDaddy.com, Inc. 149 53 33 169
25 Hosteurope GmbH 154 13 2 165
26 OVH SAS 136 27 6 157
27 Sedo Domain Parking 127 44 20 151
28 New Dream Network, LLC 197 16 65 148
29 Hetzner Online AG 51 112 17 146
30 DOMAINFACTORY 150 7 19 138
31 ALLHOSTSHOP.COM 118 15 - 133
32 Layered Technologies, Inc. 101 651 637 115
33 Akamai Technologies 9 596 495 110
34 Akamai 7 315 217 105
35 Ecommerce Corporation 95 12 5 102
36 Alfahosting GmbH 89 11 - 100
37 Layered Technologies, Inc. 123 653 677 99
38 pair Networks 107 8 16 99
39 Endurance International Group, Inc. 92 11 4 99
40 Endurance International Group, Inc. 81 23 8 96
41 One.com A/S 105 1 10 96
42 Korea Telecom 32 72 9 95
43 T-Online International AG 93 2 6 89
44 Beijing Lingse Feidian Network Science&Technology Co Ltd 76 34 21 89
45 simple-ASP GmbH 80 8 - 88
46 ICT Informatique 87 1 1 87
47 Aruba S.p.A. - Shared Hosting and Mail services 78 15 7 86
48 1blu web hosting Frankfurt 82 8 4 86
49 IPX Server GmbH 89 6 10 85
50 burst.net 89 32 36 85

If you represent a hosting company and would like your sites added to the list of sites monitored each day please mail us.

Interpreting the Table

The table is based on observing movements in sites queried by people using our what's that site running? form. Consequently, "New" sites are those which are being queried for the first time by users of this site, and are not necessarily new to the Internet. "Lost" sites are those which have moved to a competitor, and "Gains" are those sites which have been taken from a competitor.

We also provide a more comprehensive analysis of switching between hosting locations based on the sites found by the web server survey (55M in October 2004), which is described in more detail here.

Sites shown as hosted on netblocks assigned to the internet registries such as ARIN & RIPE, are hosted on ip addresses which have been recently assigned and for which we do not yet have delegation information.

"unspecified LACNIC allocation" is the ip address registry for Latin America. So far as we know LACNIC does not make ip address delegation information available, and so the ip address space controlled by that registry shows up in this table as if it was a single hosting location. If you are able to help us obtain ip address delegation information for LACNIC, please mail us.

Sites that use caching or content delivery systems sometimes appear to fluctuate between their primary location, and their content delivery system, typically Akamai.

Your comments and suggestions are most welcome webmaster@netcraft.com © Netcraft 2010