Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 40 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.135 0.014 0.202 0.202 - 0
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.105 0.015 0.186 0.187 3850 1
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.103 0.018 0.034 0.047 678 9
4 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.233 0.026 0.053 0.144 587 54
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.096 0.037 0.076 0.076 - 0
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.273 0.058 0.115 0.116 2377 3
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.122 0.059 0.120 0.120 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.220 0.062 0.141 0.141 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.192 0.063 0.124 0.265 288 41
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.131 0.066 0.153 0.260 321 35
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.150 0.068 0.143 0.331 298 56
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.146 0.070 0.152 0.193 356 15
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.105 0.071 0.166 0.166 - -
14 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.149 0.073 0.143 0.189 366 17
15 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.145 0.075 0.198 0.439 142 34
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.083 0.075 0.148 0.148 - 0
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.272 0.075 0.150 0.150 - -
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.170 0.077 0.153 0.194 273 11
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.157 0.078 0.152 0.152 - 0
20 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.221 0.078 0.157 0.533 79 30
21 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.219 0.079 0.166 0.924 98 74
22 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.143 0.082 0.170 0.443 171 47
23 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.057 0.082 0.164 0.164 - 0
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.348 0.084 0.385 0.633 85 21
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.232 0.084 0.625 1.675 59 62
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.290 0.098 0.572 1.015 233 103
27 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.159 0.101 0.639 0.955 215 68
28 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.167 0.105 0.211 0.211 - -
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.266 0.113 0.228 0.228 - 0
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.205 0.157 0.304 0.455 108 16
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.197 0.126 0.282 0.607 74 24
32 unknown  0:00:00  0.580  0.126 0.013 0.492 0.524 1267 41
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.693  0.266 0.097 0.183 0.183 - 0
34 unknown  0:00:00  0.695  0.145 0.015 1.197 1.315 747 88
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.696  0.332 0.012 0.031 0.073 1157 49
36 unknown  0:00:00  0.923  0.076 0.074 0.140 0.140 - 0
37 Linux  0:00:00  1.151  0.254 0.096 0.183 0.186 - -
38 Linux  0:00:00  1.153  0.170 0.026 0.053 0.053 - 0
39 unknown  0:00:00  1.379  0.247 0.087 0.261 0.261 - 0
40 Windows Server 2008  0:18:36  9.667  0.126 0.092 0.182 0.446 88 23
 

Report from 22-Nov-2014 00:50 till 23-Nov-2014 00:47

Generated on 23-Nov-2014 00:53

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.