Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 40 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.132 0.011 0.211 0.211 - 0
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.273 0.012 0.044 0.100 879 49
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.154 0.013 1.236 1.355 740 88
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.109 0.018 0.035 0.048 658 9
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.251 0.021 0.047 0.129 647 54
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.177 0.025 0.051 0.052 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.100 0.037 0.075 0.075 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.126 0.059 0.137 0.137 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.244 0.062 0.140 0.140 - 0
10 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.067 0.064 0.129 0.129 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.138 0.066 0.156 0.265 318 35
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.164 0.070 0.156 0.198 354 15
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.113 0.074 0.173 0.183 - -
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.303 0.075 0.151 0.151 - -
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.169 0.076 0.152 0.193 276 11
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.086 0.078 0.152 0.152 - 0
17 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.216 0.078 0.156 0.539 77 30
18 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.054 0.091 0.175 0.175 - 0
19 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.142 0.091 0.218 0.463 140 34
20 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.150 0.092 0.182 0.495 149 47
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.353 0.095 0.400 0.653 83 21
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.274 0.099 0.613 1.059 231 103
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.258 0.102 0.194 0.194 - 0
24 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.174 0.105 0.636 0.953 213 68
25 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.165 0.105 0.214 0.214 - -
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.184 0.125 0.282 0.618 71 24
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.282 0.126 0.244 0.244 - 0
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.217 0.160 0.311 0.485 93 16
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.464  0.249 0.179 0.722 1.807 58 63
30 unknown  0:00:00  0.465  0.126 0.013 0.500 0.537 1116 41
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.577  0.139 0.084 0.159 0.159 - 0
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.261 0.066 0.132 0.138 503 3
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.218 0.095 0.183 0.187 - -
34 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.694  0.277 0.078 0.159 0.924 97 74
35 unknown  0:00:00  0.694  0.228 0.084 0.253 0.253 - 0
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.695  0.188 0.065 0.125 0.256 311 41
37 unknown  0:00:00  0.925  0.101 0.030 0.217 0.218 3656 1
38 Linux  0:00:00  1.042  0.142 0.068 0.141 0.328 299 56
39 FreeBSD  0:00:00  1.381  0.144 0.081 0.152 0.198 358 17
40 Windows Server 2008  0:18:36  7.650  0.110 0.113 0.214 0.481 87 23
 

Report from 22-Nov-2014 19:50 till 23-Nov-2014 19:47

Generated on 23-Nov-2014 19:51

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.