Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.139 0.011 1.243 1.362 739 88
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.315 0.012 0.034 0.080 1061 49
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.137 0.013 0.210 0.210 - 0
4 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.080 0.014 0.160 0.160 2391 1
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.102 0.016 0.033 0.045 716 9
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.099 0.041 0.080 0.080 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.132 0.060 0.121 0.121 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.144 0.063 0.142 0.142 - 0
9 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.072 0.065 0.132 0.132 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.218 0.067 0.133 0.231 244 24
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.130 0.068 0.153 0.264 316 35
12 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.137 0.069 0.137 0.183 363 17
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.161 0.070 0.147 0.189 270 11
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.107 0.071 0.169 0.170 - -
15 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.240 0.075 0.157 0.550 75 30
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.155 0.078 0.152 0.152 - 0
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.080 0.078 0.153 0.153 - 0
18 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.142 0.080 0.162 0.948 95 74
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.143 0.082 0.165 0.211 318 15
20 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.193 0.082 0.174 0.454 167 47
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.238 0.083 0.170 0.170 - 0
22 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.055 0.091 0.173 0.173 - 0
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.279 0.097 0.630 1.110 215 103
24 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.191 0.101 0.635 0.967 205 68
25 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.152 0.103 0.206 0.206 - -
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.240 0.112 0.227 0.227 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.212 0.129 0.212 0.212 - -
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.229 0.153 0.303 0.460 104 16
29 unknown  0:00:00  0.579  0.136 0.012 0.503 0.539 1151 41
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.179 0.026 0.053 0.053 - 0
31 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.579  0.148 0.072 0.198 0.427 149 34
32 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.579  0.120 0.075 0.151 0.378 103 23
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.194 0.118 0.275 0.590 76 24
34 unknown  0:00:00  0.694  0.263 0.084 0.257 0.257 - 0
35 Linux  0:00:00  1.153  0.359 0.114 0.420 0.675 82 21
36 unknown  0:00:00  1.381  0.245 0.023 0.050 0.171 443 54
37 Linux  0:00:00  1.720  0.140 0.074 0.183 0.394 265 56
38 Linux  0:00:00  2.283  0.303 0.075 0.153 0.153 - -
39 unknown  0:00:00  2.286  0.271 0.059 0.118 0.120 1635 3
40 Linux  0:00:00  8.442  0.191 0.076 0.152 0.303 270 41
41 Linux  0:00:00  42.072  0.242 1.024 1.483 2.581 47 52
 

Report from 25-Nov-2014 12:36 till 26-Nov-2014 12:30

Generated on 26-Nov-2014 12:37

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.