Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.314 0.010 0.029 0.063 1441 49
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.185 0.010 0.190 0.190 - 0
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.249 0.015 0.034 0.106 731 52
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.121 0.023 0.047 0.047 - 0
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.149 0.024 0.051 0.051 - 0
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.081 0.052 0.104 0.104 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.105 0.052 0.131 0.207 448 34
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.103 0.053 0.124 0.124 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.234 0.056 0.113 0.113 - -
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.178 0.056 0.111 0.185 322 24
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.144 0.056 0.112 0.112 - 0
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.207 0.057 0.110 0.111 2500 3
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.094 0.058 0.150 0.151 - -
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.179 0.065 0.124 0.250 322 41
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.191 0.066 0.134 0.135 - -
16 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.103 0.068 0.143 0.863 101 73
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.157 0.071 0.151 0.346 276 54
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.154 0.072 0.157 0.200 349 15
19 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.141 0.073 0.142 0.183 407 17
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.094 0.074 0.147 0.147 - 0
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.212 0.075 0.153 0.153 - 0
22 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.075 0.076 0.145 0.262 199 23
23 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.263 0.078 0.161 0.561 74 29
24 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.141 0.081 0.226 0.477 136 34
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.184 0.081 0.162 0.205 260 11
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.151 0.083 0.162 0.162 - 0
27 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.144 0.099 0.197 0.197 - -
28 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.197 0.116 0.680 1.046 200 73
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.267 0.121 0.245 0.492 164 41
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.191 0.127 0.251 0.376 130 16
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.202 0.136 0.269 0.623 187 66
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.261  0.283 0.078 0.382 0.629 88 22
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.392  0.206 0.128 0.258 0.540 84 24
34 unknown  0:00:00  0.520  0.238 0.069 0.209 0.209 - 0
35 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.521  0.102 0.014 0.030 0.045 576 9
36 unknown  0:00:00  0.522  0.126 0.010 0.541 0.574 1327 43
37 unknown  0:00:00  0.777  0.078 0.009 0.148 0.148 14680 1
38 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  2.314  0.139 0.089 0.286 0.614 141 46
39 Linux  0:00:00  2.320  0.256 0.088 0.588 1.806 49 60
40 unknown  0:00:00  3.807  0.144 0.022 1.201 1.312 764 85
41 Linux  0:37:52  11.905  0.290 0.106 0.356 1.095 290 215
 

Report from 30-Sep-2014 18:11 till 1-Oct-2014 18:15

Generated on 1-Oct-2014 18:20

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.