Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 40 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.140 0.008 0.019 0.020 - -
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.090 0.012 0.027 0.043 517 9
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.313 0.017 0.199 0.199 - 0
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.088 0.017 0.197 0.197 23930 1
5 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.242 0.018 0.043 0.174 440 58
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.142 0.022 0.531 0.596 670 44
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.228 0.024 0.050 0.050 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.096 0.043 0.088 0.088 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.204 0.050 0.224 0.260 244 9
10 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.120 0.061 0.136 0.195 281 17
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.181 0.062 0.124 0.124 - 0
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.128 0.065 0.129 0.129 - 0
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.085 0.066 0.807 1.586 86 67
14 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.069 0.066 0.133 0.133 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.079 0.067 0.134 0.134 - 0
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.186 0.070 0.143 0.143 - -
17 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.199 0.070 0.143 0.143 - 0
18 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.084 0.070 0.137 0.143 489 3
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.124 0.070 0.140 0.140 - 0
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.145 0.074 0.195 0.195 - 0
21 Cisco  0:00:00  0.000  0.081 0.077 0.155 0.155 - 0
22 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.096 0.083 0.166 0.167 - 0
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.186 0.084 0.173 0.173 - 0
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.409 0.088 0.175 0.175 - 0
25 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.140 0.097 0.185 0.185 - -
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.649  0.241 0.015 0.175 0.175 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.778  0.181 0.099 0.203 0.310 152 16
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.779  0.128 0.064 0.187 0.342 254 39
29 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.779  0.223 0.084 0.171 0.172 - -
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.908  0.154 0.017 1.418 1.555 692 95
31 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  1.036  0.126 0.077 0.155 0.474 196 63
32 Linux  0:00:00  1.294  0.183 0.116 0.268 0.591 78 25
33 Linux  0:00:00  1.546  0.228 0.015 0.174 0.174 - 0
34 Linux  0:00:00  1.550  0.275 0.011 0.202 0.397 229 45
35 Linux  0:00:00  1.928  0.128 0.018 0.190 0.413 83 19
36 Linux  0:00:00  2.571  0.139 0.192 2.106 3.031 80 74
37 Linux  0:00:00  3.558  0.146 0.054 0.116 0.493 316 119
38 unknown  0:00:00  3.802  0.138 0.089 0.187 0.401 216 46
39 Linux  0:00:00  4.528  0.267 0.083 0.341 0.642 345 104
40 Linux  1:06:37  26.327  0.289 0.085 0.415 0.803 136 53
 

Report from 28-Jul-2015 04:51 till 29-Jul-2015 04:46

Generated on 29-Jul-2015 04:52

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Zurich/Qube, Amsterdam/Webair and New York/New York Internet-2. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.