Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 42 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.097 0.012 1.181 1.292 758 85
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.279 0.012 0.026 0.063 1327 49
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.118 0.013 0.470 0.503 1211 41
4 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.239 0.017 0.067 0.137 741 53
5 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.103 0.018 0.037 0.054 486 9
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.165 0.026 0.053 0.053 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.094 0.037 0.077 0.077 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.238 0.058 0.117 0.118 2618 3
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.138 0.059 0.121 0.121 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.186 0.061 0.123 0.257 304 41
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.146 0.063 0.143 0.143 - 0
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.196 0.064 0.130 0.180 218 11
13 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.088 0.065 0.130 0.130 - 0
14 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.070 0.068 0.134 0.134 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.113 0.069 0.159 0.267 321 35
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.164 0.071 0.154 0.199 329 15
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.168 0.072 0.150 0.194 259 11
18 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.225 0.073 0.150 0.522 79 30
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.276 0.073 0.143 0.143 - -
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.136 0.073 0.173 0.175 - -
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.077 0.074 0.149 0.149 - 0
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.146 0.076 0.152 0.152 - 0
23 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.158 0.078 0.209 0.510 181 55
24 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.152 0.081 0.254 0.254 - 0
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.228 0.081 0.574 1.810 52 64
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.210 0.082 0.166 0.166 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.330 0.086 0.378 0.649 79 21
28 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.127 0.087 0.283 0.591 151 46
29 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.126 0.093 0.190 0.947 96 72
30 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.172 0.100 1.043 1.364 205 66
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.289 0.101 0.339 0.784 235 104
32 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.139 0.103 0.205 0.205 - -
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.237 0.113 0.227 0.462 173 41
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.184 0.125 0.247 0.511 90 24
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.207 0.146 0.300 0.724 156 66
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.216 0.150 0.300 0.454 106 16
37 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.215 0.226 0.310 0.313 - -
38 unknown  0:00:00  0.462  0.120 0.024 0.206 0.206 1709 1
39 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.462  0.101 0.074 0.153 0.379 101 23
40 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.577  0.136 0.069 0.137 0.181 384 17
41 Linux  0:00:00  1.151  0.121 0.008 0.171 0.171 - 0
42 Linux  0:00:00  2.283  0.141 0.067 0.143 0.332 296 56
 

Report from 24-Oct-2014 18:10 till 25-Oct-2014 18:07

Generated on 25-Oct-2014 18:11

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.