Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 42 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.284 0.013 0.030 0.072 1166 49
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.253 0.017 0.067 0.141 711 53
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.166 0.026 0.053 0.053 - 0
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.109 0.038 0.079 0.079 - 0
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.242 0.059 0.117 0.119 2606 3
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.145 0.060 0.122 0.122 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.176 0.062 0.124 0.263 293 41
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.194 0.064 0.130 0.221 235 21
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.136 0.066 0.146 0.146 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.115 0.067 0.159 0.272 305 35
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.148 0.068 0.146 0.335 295 56
12 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.080 0.069 0.136 0.136 - 0
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.180 0.073 0.150 0.193 264 11
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.083 0.075 0.150 0.150 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.138 0.079 0.156 0.156 - 0
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.236 0.081 0.568 1.765 53 63
17 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.154 0.082 0.251 0.251 - 0
18 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.138 0.084 0.277 0.592 147 46
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.263 0.084 0.154 0.154 - -
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.308 0.088 0.387 0.657 79 21
21 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.144 0.088 0.174 0.932 96 72
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.250 0.110 0.225 0.460 173 41
23 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.181 0.114 1.006 1.360 186 66
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.195 0.126 0.253 0.516 91 24
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.203 0.152 0.301 0.453 107 16
26 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.462  0.124 0.022 0.041 0.061 439 9
27 unknown  0:00:00  0.462  0.086 0.065 0.131 0.131 - 0
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.462  0.216 0.147 0.302 0.734 153 66
29 unknown  0:00:00  0.463  0.113 0.047 0.526 0.580 752 41
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.577  0.171 0.081 0.163 0.208 328 15
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.577  0.221 0.082 0.168 0.168 - 0
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.577  0.202 0.180 0.268 0.274 - -
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.578  0.143 0.074 0.178 0.181 - -
34 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.578  0.165 0.075 0.205 0.483 167 46
35 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.579  0.212 0.078 0.155 0.534 78 30
36 unknown  0:00:00  0.579  0.140 0.104 0.209 0.209 - -
37 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.694  0.141 0.069 0.139 0.183 383 17
38 Linux  0:00:00  0.922  0.286 0.099 0.342 0.794 231 104
39 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.924  0.127 0.079 0.160 0.392 99 23
40 Linux  0:00:00  1.376  0.108 0.009 0.190 0.190 - 0
41 unknown  0:00:00  1.381  0.103 0.037 0.226 0.227 1190 1
42 unknown  0:00:00  2.283  0.119 0.027 1.172 1.287 734 85
 

Report from 24-Oct-2014 03:21 till 25-Oct-2014 03:20

Generated on 25-Oct-2014 03:29

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.