Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.289 0.008 0.019 0.048 1705 49
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.169 0.009 0.202 0.202 - 0
3 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.082 0.016 0.033 0.049 511 9
4 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.089 0.016 0.195 0.195 9380 1
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.196 0.020 0.042 0.116 710 52
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.133 0.023 0.478 0.512 1220 41
7 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.166 0.029 0.056 0.056 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.103 0.041 0.080 0.080 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.237 0.058 0.116 0.117 2633 3
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.126 0.059 0.120 0.120 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.113 0.062 0.141 0.141 - 0
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.202 0.063 0.129 0.227 244 24
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.208 0.064 0.127 0.264 298 41
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.115 0.066 0.161 0.269 320 35
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.160 0.068 0.144 0.342 283 56
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.226 0.069 0.138 0.138 - -
17 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.082 0.070 0.135 0.135 - 0
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.113 0.070 0.167 0.167 - -
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.164 0.071 0.154 0.198 333 15
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.172 0.072 0.150 0.193 259 11
21 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.057 0.073 0.140 0.140 - 0
22 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.213 0.074 0.159 0.529 80 30
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.083 0.075 0.150 0.150 - 0
24 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.136 0.075 0.209 0.524 173 55
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.132 0.077 0.154 0.154 - 0
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.201 0.080 0.162 0.163 - -
27 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.115 0.081 0.168 0.930 95 72
28 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.126 0.081 0.287 0.584 153 45
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.237 0.083 0.170 0.170 - 0
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.371 0.092 0.406 0.643 88 21
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.277 0.097 0.585 1.027 235 104
32 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.149 0.101 0.773 1.099 202 66
33 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.137 0.106 0.211 0.211 - -
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.173 0.118 0.238 0.501 91 24
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.182 0.118 0.234 0.353 137 16
36 unknown  0:00:00  0.232  0.093 0.012 1.170 1.281 763 85
37 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.232  0.140 0.072 0.141 0.185 378 17
38 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.464  0.116 0.078 0.162 0.389 101 23
39 Linux  0:00:00  0.464  0.232 0.121 0.240 0.479 170 41
40 unknown  0:00:00  1.720  0.171 0.081 0.251 0.252 - 0
41 Linux  0:00:00  16.199  0.229 0.544 1.046 2.345 42 54
 

Report from 30-Oct-2014 21:10 till 31-Oct-2014 21:15

Generated on 31-Oct-2014 21:21

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.