Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 39 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.256 0.005 0.013 0.013 - -
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.295 0.005 0.017 0.034 770 13
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.098 0.007 0.164 0.164 5706 1
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.159 0.012 0.042 0.052 859 9
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.326 0.021 0.163 0.164 - 0
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.390 0.023 0.047 0.047 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.202 0.038 0.109 0.109 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.216 0.058 0.117 0.118 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.146 0.059 0.119 0.119 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.140 0.059 0.121 0.121 - 0
11 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.146 0.062 0.125 0.195 240 17
12 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.087 0.064 0.130 0.130 - 0
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.226 0.066 0.131 0.131 - 0
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.122 0.066 0.133 0.133 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.143 0.067 0.133 0.133 - -
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.181 0.069 0.141 0.142 - -
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.181 0.071 0.143 0.145 8215 15
18 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.177 0.074 0.150 0.150 - -
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.292 0.075 0.337 0.500 159 26
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.112 0.075 0.177 0.177 - 0
21 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.231 0.077 0.149 0.149 - 0
22 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.170 0.081 0.171 0.171 - -
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.187 0.089 0.177 0.177 - 0
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.075 0.090 0.182 0.182 - 0
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.274 0.090 0.175 0.175 - 0
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.162 0.092 0.183 0.183 - 0
27 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.178 0.100 0.211 0.211 - -
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.481 0.199 0.417 0.417 - 0
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.131  0.216 0.006 0.588 0.615 1616 44
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.131  0.149 0.063 0.269 0.417 294 43
31 unknown  0:00:00  0.131  0.518 0.115 0.230 0.230 - 0
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.262  0.327 0.006 0.147 0.147 - 0
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.262  0.183 0.106 0.209 0.400 150 29
34 unknown  0:00:00  0.394  0.605 0.047 0.096 0.359 573 151
35 unknown  0:00:00  0.394  0.175 0.091 0.188 0.401 239 51
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.524  0.142 0.181 1.779 2.909 112 127
37 Linux  0:00:00  1.048  0.122 0.006 0.148 0.148 - 0
38 Linux  0:00:00  1.181  0.149 0.008 0.154 0.353 147 29
39 Linux  0:15:00  1.314  0.257 0.006 1.765 1.887 793 97
 

Report from 13-Feb-2016 23:00 till 14-Feb-2016 22:54

Generated on 14-Feb-2016 23:04

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Zurich/Qube, Amsterdam/Webair, New York/New York Internet-2, Italy/Aruba-2 and Pennsylvania/INetU-3. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.