Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 44 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.064 0.024 0.046 0.046 - 0
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.190 0.050 0.100 0.101 2499 3
3 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.039 0.051 0.122 0.228 218 23
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.154 0.052 0.105 0.184 318 25
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.100 0.055 0.126 0.126 - 0
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.220 0.055 0.108 0.108 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.129 0.065 0.162 0.279 300 35
8 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.112 0.069 0.138 0.178 410 17
9 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.100 0.069 0.149 0.849 105 74
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.152 0.072 0.152 0.193 270 11
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.138 0.073 0.157 0.201 344 15
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.130 0.074 0.149 0.334 291 54
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.077 0.076 0.148 0.148 - 0
14 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.166 0.076 0.152 0.383 227 53
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.233 0.076 0.343 0.639 182 54
16 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.132 0.077 0.229 0.557 216 71
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.295 0.078 0.323 0.546 98 22
18 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.214 0.080 0.167 0.577 72 29
19 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.103 0.084 0.296 0.609 150 47
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.127 0.089 0.166 0.166 - 0
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.240 0.100 0.335 1.061 303 220
22 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.194 0.117 0.673 1.041 213 78
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.181 0.123 0.566 0.897 199 66
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.240 0.125 0.256 0.508 149 38
25 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.060 0.126 0.254 0.627 146 55
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.177 0.128 0.257 0.539 84 24
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.171 0.130 0.255 0.381 129 16
28 unknown  0:00:00  0.520  0.098 0.053 0.106 0.106 - 0
29 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.521  0.094 0.014 0.029 0.044 587 9
30 unknown  0:00:00  0.521  0.060 0.054 0.394 0.394 - 0
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.521  0.182 0.056 0.112 0.112 - -
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.521  0.166 0.155 0.227 0.228 - -
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.522  0.095 0.052 0.121 0.197 454 34
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.650  0.127 0.060 0.142 0.142 - -
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.650  0.186 0.130 0.259 0.259 - 0
36 unknown  0:00:00  0.653  0.112 0.021 1.337 1.462 676 85
37 unknown  0:00:00  0.780  0.090 0.019 0.140 0.140 16082 1
38 Linux  0:00:00  0.783  0.225 0.085 0.559 1.760 49 59
39 unknown  0:00:00  1.042  0.103 0.020 0.590 0.638 904 43
40 Linux  0:00:00  1.294  0.241 0.074 0.150 0.150 - 0
41 Linux  0:00:00  2.305  0.109 0.010 0.287 0.332 1394 64
42 unknown  0:00:00  3.567  0.237 0.072 0.240 0.240 - 0
43 unknown  0:41:21  12.766  0.113 0.098 0.201 0.201 - -
44 Linux  2:17:08  83.480  0.097 0.076 0.157 10.485 3 30
Report from 28-Aug-2014 21:55 till 29-Aug-2014 21:55
Generated on 29-Aug-2014 22:04

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.