Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.139 0.011 1.145 1.258 782 88
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.093 0.015 0.032 0.044 700 9
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.131 0.016 0.457 0.488 1334 41
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.174 0.025 0.055 0.055 - 0
5 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.237 0.025 0.055 0.155 537 54
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.088 0.035 0.072 0.072 - 0
7 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.252 0.059 0.117 0.118 2167 3
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.149 0.061 0.138 0.138 - 0
9 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.075 0.063 0.125 0.125 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.250 0.063 0.126 0.225 260 25
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.141 0.063 0.125 0.125 - 0
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.172 0.066 0.128 0.265 297 41
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.113 0.068 0.163 0.163 - -
14 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.125 0.068 0.139 0.184 373 17
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.136 0.069 0.145 0.336 302 58
16 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.201 0.073 0.152 0.540 76 30
17 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.000  0.126 0.073 0.203 0.432 131 30
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.264 0.073 0.146 0.146 - -
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.126 0.075 0.150 0.150 - 0
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.075 0.077 0.152 0.152 - 0
21 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.061 0.084 0.169 0.169 - 0
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.223 0.084 0.169 0.169 - 0
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.467 0.086 0.170 0.170 - 0
24 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.179 0.086 0.174 0.459 158 45
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.210 0.088 0.168 0.170 - -
26 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.150 0.105 0.211 0.211 - -
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.167 0.115 0.229 0.352 132 16
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.197 0.132 0.291 0.621 72 24
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.116  0.279 0.008 0.030 0.063 1502 49
30 unknown  0:00:00  0.348  0.159 0.102 0.658 0.974 217 68
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.348  0.260 0.111 0.224 0.224 - 0
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.463  0.232 0.082 0.619 1.632 67 67
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.463  0.276 0.097 0.600 1.057 229 104
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.464  0.120 0.065 0.147 0.254 330 35
35 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  1.379  0.115 0.077 0.152 0.368 111 24
36 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  1.379  0.174 0.085 0.165 0.944 95 74
37 Linux  0:00:00  1.381  0.170 0.072 0.154 0.198 341 15
38 unknown  0:00:00  1.833  0.062 0.010 0.153 0.153 3234 1
39 Linux  0:00:00  1.833  0.179 0.072 0.150 0.192 268 11
40 unknown  0:00:00  2.727  0.262 0.085 0.250 0.250 - 0
41 Linux  0:00:00  11.087  0.137 0.009 0.201 0.201 - 0
 

Report from 17-Dec-2014 08:26 till 18-Dec-2014 08:26

Generated on 18-Dec-2014 08:33

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.