Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 43 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.124 0.008 0.564 0.593 1486 43
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.240 0.017 0.030 0.061 1591 49
3 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.105 0.017 0.033 0.048 579 9
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.138 0.018 0.196 0.196 - 0
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.070 0.021 0.043 0.043 - 0
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.140 0.021 0.052 0.113 852 52
7 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.163 0.029 0.060 0.060 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.199 0.051 0.100 0.102 2471 3
9 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.071 0.051 0.104 0.104 - 0
10 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.057 0.052 0.122 0.228 218 23
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.116 0.052 0.105 0.105 - 0
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.142 0.052 0.127 0.127 - 0
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.175 0.053 0.107 0.182 338 25
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.086 0.056 0.137 0.137 - -
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.158 0.062 0.120 0.258 295 41
16 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.118 0.069 0.139 0.181 404 17
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.146 0.072 0.156 0.199 343 15
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.277 0.073 0.354 0.660 177 54
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.072 0.073 0.147 0.147 - 0
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.152 0.074 0.152 0.337 291 54
21 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.129 0.075 0.211 0.460 137 34
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.173 0.076 0.155 0.197 267 11
23 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.215 0.077 0.161 0.555 75 30
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.233 0.079 0.168 0.168 - 0
25 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.105 0.081 0.151 0.895 99 74
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.125 0.085 0.163 0.163 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.267 0.098 0.610 1.688 57 61
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.261 0.102 0.343 1.091 295 221
29 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.131 0.103 0.202 0.202 - -
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.263 0.123 0.247 0.498 160 40
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.186 0.123 0.261 0.608 187 65
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.169 0.125 0.248 0.373 131 16
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.223 0.132 0.267 0.548 85 24
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.197 0.135 0.272 0.272 - 0
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.194 0.141 0.212 0.212 - -
36 unknown  0:00:00  0.390  0.178 0.117 0.655 1.047 185 73
37 Linux  0:00:00  0.519  0.183 0.056 0.113 0.113 - -
38 Linux  0:00:00  0.519  0.270 0.070 0.326 0.584 84 22
39 unknown  0:00:00  0.519  0.168 0.071 0.205 0.205 - 0
40 Linux  0:00:00  0.520  0.100 0.054 0.138 0.237 348 34
41 unknown  0:00:00  0.649  0.139 0.008 1.339 1.450 761 85
42 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.778  0.114 0.088 0.302 0.613 149 46
43 unknown  0:00:00  2.065  0.080 0.011 0.145 0.145 15949 1
 

Report from 18-Sep-2014 09:45 till 19-Sep-2014 09:47

Generated on 19-Sep-2014 09:50

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.