Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.112 0.017 0.034 0.052 487 9
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.227 0.021 0.041 0.114 723 52
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.101 0.038 0.078 0.078 - 0
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.149 0.063 0.143 0.143 - 0
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.076 0.065 0.130 0.130 - 0
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.104 0.068 0.166 0.276 313 35
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.170 0.072 0.151 0.194 260 11
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.171 0.073 0.160 0.208 311 15
9 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.000  0.129 0.075 0.154 0.382 101 23
10 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.209 0.077 0.163 0.537 79 30
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.220 0.080 0.146 0.303 259 41
12 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.122 0.080 0.237 1.050 89 72
13 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.136 0.083 0.279 0.589 150 46
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.229 0.087 0.175 0.175 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.413 0.088 0.411 0.683 79 21
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.203 0.089 0.173 0.176 - -
17 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.139 0.106 0.212 0.212 - -
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.233 0.117 0.233 0.478 166 41
19 unknown  0:00:00  0.348  0.108 0.023 1.254 1.371 720 85
20 unknown  0:00:00  0.348  0.220 0.035 0.072 0.072 - 0
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.348  0.199 0.064 0.129 0.230 238 24
22 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.348  0.151 0.068 0.136 0.180 377 17
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.348  0.088 0.078 0.152 0.152 - 0
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.462  0.260 0.098 0.364 0.812 231 104
25 unknown  0:00:00  0.463  0.139 0.023 0.501 0.534 1245 41
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.463  0.222 0.070 0.140 0.140 - -
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.463  0.186 0.121 0.241 0.366 130 16
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.465  0.285 0.008 0.031 0.071 1254 49
29 unknown  0:00:00  0.577  0.202 0.086 0.256 0.256 - 0
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.578  0.107 0.072 0.176 0.177 - -
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.693  0.160 0.009 0.203 0.203 - 0
32 unknown  0:00:00  0.693  0.167 0.106 0.783 1.119 195 66
33 unknown  0:00:00  0.694  0.088 0.020 0.198 0.198 12256 1
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.922  0.133 0.077 0.154 0.154 - 0
35 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.923  0.129 0.086 0.219 0.537 172 55
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.925  0.192 0.124 0.246 0.526 85 24
37 Linux  0:00:00  1.151  0.230 0.059 0.117 0.118 2642 3
38 Linux  0:00:00  1.373  0.136 0.060 0.122 0.122 - 0
39 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  1.382  0.056 0.091 0.159 0.159 - 0
40 Linux  0:00:00  1.837  0.177 0.080 0.158 0.356 282 56
41 unknown  0:00:00  2.064  0.236 0.082 0.169 0.176 - 0
 

Report from 29-Oct-2014 15:06 till 30-Oct-2014 15:03

Generated on 30-Oct-2014 15:13

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.