Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.273 0.007 0.024 0.050 1825 49
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.139 0.013 1.295 1.415 735 88
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.092 0.035 0.072 0.072 - 0
4 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.227 0.059 0.117 0.118 2601 3
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.161 0.064 0.126 0.262 300 41
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.106 0.067 0.167 0.168 - -
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.125 0.069 0.143 0.333 303 58
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.156 0.070 0.153 0.194 354 15
9 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.000  0.125 0.073 0.202 0.431 131 30
10 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.189 0.073 0.150 0.536 77 30
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.167 0.075 0.152 0.194 269 11
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.122 0.075 0.151 0.151 - 0
13 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.000  0.093 0.078 0.159 0.383 107 24
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.232 0.082 0.605 1.572 70 67
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.423 0.082 0.165 0.165 - 0
16 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.052 0.085 0.167 0.167 - 0
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.255 0.094 0.178 0.178 - -
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.250 0.094 0.592 1.042 233 104
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.225 0.129 0.208 0.208 - -
20 unknown  0:00:00  0.464  0.069 0.013 0.179 0.180 907 1
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.578  0.147 0.061 0.139 0.139 - 0
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.097 0.019 0.035 0.048 709 9
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.089 0.086 0.167 0.167 - 0
24 unknown  0:00:00  0.579  0.240 0.087 0.247 0.247 - 0
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.694  0.160 0.114 0.231 0.351 135 16
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.925  0.188 0.127 0.286 0.649 66 24
27 unknown  0:00:00  1.151  0.074 0.063 0.132 0.132 - 0
28 unknown  0:00:00  1.153  0.125 0.013 0.507 0.541 1208 41
29 Linux  0:00:00  1.153  0.154 0.035 0.063 0.064 - 0
30 Linux  0:00:00  1.153  0.246 0.063 0.127 0.203 257 20
31 Linux  0:00:00  1.153  0.114 0.078 0.158 0.263 335 35
32 Linux  0:00:00  1.379  0.125 0.059 0.120 0.120 - 0
33 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  1.379  0.127 0.077 0.157 0.931 96 74
34 Linux  0:00:00  1.379  0.205 0.086 0.173 0.173 - 0
35 unknown  0:00:00  1.381  0.143 0.102 0.624 0.949 210 68
36 unknown  0:00:00  1.726  0.153 0.105 0.210 0.210 - -
37 Linux  0:00:00  2.286  0.227 0.109 0.219 0.219 - 0
38 FreeBSD  0:00:00  2.395  0.208 0.025 0.055 0.147 590 54
39 FreeBSD  0:00:00  3.171  0.115 0.072 0.139 0.182 388 17
40 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  5.438  0.196 0.087 0.174 0.449 161 44
41 Linux  0:00:00  13.017  0.153 0.009 0.160 0.160 - 0
 

Report from 21-Dec-2014 07:05 till 22-Dec-2014 07:00

Generated on 22-Dec-2014 07:09

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.