Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.279 0.008 0.019 0.049 1670 49
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.104 0.012 1.174 1.286 760 85
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.087 0.015 0.191 0.192 3311 1
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.167 0.015 0.199 0.199 - 0
5 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.080 0.016 0.033 0.050 513 9
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.204 0.021 0.046 0.124 671 52
7 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.120 0.023 0.477 0.510 1245 41
8 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.159 0.029 0.056 0.056 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.105 0.042 0.082 0.082 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.222 0.058 0.116 0.118 1944 3
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.125 0.060 0.121 0.121 - 0
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.116 0.062 0.142 0.142 - 0
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.207 0.064 0.130 0.228 243 24
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.118 0.067 0.164 0.274 313 35
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.148 0.069 0.147 0.347 281 56
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.226 0.069 0.138 0.138 - -
17 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.057 0.069 0.137 0.137 - 0
18 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.083 0.070 0.135 0.135 - 0
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.116 0.070 0.167 0.167 - -
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.210 0.071 0.134 0.272 296 41
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.162 0.071 0.154 0.199 333 15
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.168 0.072 0.149 0.193 261 11
23 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.208 0.074 0.162 0.533 80 30
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.084 0.075 0.149 0.149 - 0
25 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.137 0.075 0.209 0.528 171 55
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.131 0.077 0.154 0.154 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.200 0.081 0.164 0.164 - -
28 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.119 0.081 0.172 0.939 94 72
29 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.124 0.082 0.288 0.584 153 45
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.237 0.083 0.170 0.170 - 0
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.388 0.086 0.400 0.639 88 21
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.273 0.098 0.587 1.034 233 104
33 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.151 0.102 0.774 1.100 201 65
34 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.137 0.106 0.212 0.212 - -
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.180 0.117 0.234 0.354 134 16
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.241 0.119 0.238 0.478 170 41
37 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.177 0.122 0.242 0.505 91 24
38 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.461  0.122 0.078 0.162 0.388 101 23
39 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.690  0.142 0.072 0.141 0.186 373 17
40 unknown  0:00:00  1.378  0.157 0.082 0.252 0.252 - 0
41 Linux  0:00:00  14.718  0.233 0.539 1.037 2.366 41 55
 

Report from 31-Oct-2014 02:26 till 1-Nov-2014 02:27

Generated on 1-Nov-2014 02:32

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.