Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 43 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order. Click the site name to see graphs of site performance. FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.106 0.012 0.298 0.347 1276 62
2 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.079 0.014 0.029 0.043 582 9
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.277 0.016 0.033 0.126 562 52
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.074 0.020 0.042 0.042 - 0
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.177 0.050 0.101 0.102 2368 3
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.247 0.051 0.104 0.104 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.089 0.052 0.126 0.204 442 34
8 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.089 0.052 0.104 0.104 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.151 0.053 0.108 0.209 249 25
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.103 0.054 0.125 0.125 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.213 0.056 0.112 0.112 - -
12 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.070 0.057 0.121 0.228 215 23
13 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.083 0.058 0.387 0.387 - 0
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.119 0.060 0.149 0.151 - -
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.110 0.066 0.129 0.222 377 35
16 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.185 0.067 0.201 0.201 - 0
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.138 0.069 0.145 0.329 292 54
18 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.116 0.072 0.143 0.184 407 17
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.224 0.073 0.343 0.639 182 54
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.135 0.074 0.150 0.150 - 0
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.167 0.075 0.157 0.201 252 11
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.114 0.075 0.373 0.607 93 22
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.131 0.076 0.160 0.205 333 15
24 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.135 0.076 0.222 0.545 220 71
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.158 0.079 0.157 0.158 - 0
26 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.213 0.081 0.166 0.580 71 29
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.246 0.087 0.571 1.640 56 59
28 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.118 0.096 0.306 0.635 144 47
29 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.134 0.099 0.198 0.198 - -
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.263 0.101 0.338 1.079 294 218
31 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.170 0.116 0.508 1.605 66 72
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.199 0.122 0.193 0.193 - -
33 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.063 0.124 0.254 0.635 143 55
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.232 0.125 0.255 0.496 157 38
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.163 0.132 0.603 0.930 199 65
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.195 0.136 0.264 0.264 - 0
37 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.175 0.141 0.271 0.554 84 24
38 Linux  0:00:00  0.522  0.089 0.075 0.154 1.198 29 30
39 Linux  0:00:00  0.523  0.084 0.072 0.143 0.143 - 0
40 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  1.295  0.094 0.072 0.164 0.868 105 74
41 Linux  0:00:00  1.297  0.169 0.124 0.249 0.375 129 16
42 unknown  0:00:00  1.935  0.087 0.010 1.321 1.426 816 86
43 unknown  0:00:00  1.938  0.103 0.014 0.597 0.627 1432 43
Report from 19-Aug-2014 16:30 till 20-Aug-2014 16:26
Generated on 20-Aug-2014 16:34

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.