Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 42 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.129 0.013 0.467 0.503 1157 41
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.313 0.016 0.029 0.066 1315 49
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.224 0.017 0.037 0.106 763 53
4 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.098 0.022 0.040 0.059 456 9
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.104 0.022 1.208 1.335 668 85
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.165 0.026 0.053 0.053 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.111 0.038 0.078 0.078 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.240 0.059 0.117 0.119 1708 3
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.153 0.063 0.145 0.145 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.201 0.064 0.127 0.262 301 41
11 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.107 0.065 0.132 0.132 - 0
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.201 0.065 0.132 0.172 201 8
13 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.131 0.068 0.137 0.181 382 17
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.180 0.071 0.154 0.199 329 15
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.186 0.073 0.151 0.195 256 11
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.115 0.073 0.159 0.275 297 35
17 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.224 0.073 0.152 0.524 80 30
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.077 0.074 0.149 0.149 - 0
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.157 0.074 0.172 0.175 - -
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.144 0.076 0.153 0.153 - 0
21 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.151 0.078 0.209 0.514 179 55
22 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.064 0.079 0.147 0.147 - 0
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.274 0.079 0.150 0.150 - -
24 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.171 0.081 0.254 0.254 - 0
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.229 0.082 0.574 1.860 50 64
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.200 0.085 0.169 0.169 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.334 0.090 0.380 0.652 79 21
28 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.136 0.094 0.282 0.588 151 46
29 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.124 0.098 0.201 0.969 94 72
30 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.175 0.100 1.033 1.352 207 66
31 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.141 0.103 0.207 0.207 - -
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.305 0.108 0.347 0.840 212 104
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.242 0.113 0.227 0.462 173 41
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.182 0.122 0.246 0.521 87 24
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.202 0.147 0.301 0.737 151 66
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.217 0.154 0.308 0.468 101 16
37 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.220 0.256 0.342 0.347 - -
38 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.445  0.100 0.075 0.154 0.382 100 23
39 Linux  0:00:00  0.664  0.127 0.008 0.169 0.169 - 0
40 Linux  0:00:00  0.664  0.135 0.060 0.121 0.122 - 0
41 unknown  0:00:00  0.667  0.112 0.020 0.205 0.206 1345 1
42 Linux  0:00:00  2.726  0.146 0.068 0.142 0.331 295 56
 

Report from 25-Oct-2014 00:51 till 26-Oct-2014 01:59

Generated on 26-Oct-2014 01:52

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.