Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 40 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.125 0.007 0.018 0.019 - -
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.101 0.011 0.025 0.035 866 9
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.090 0.016 0.200 0.200 24219 1
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.297 0.017 0.207 0.207 - 0
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.236 0.018 0.173 0.173 - 0
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.288 0.024 0.050 0.050 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.100 0.043 0.087 0.087 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.178 0.050 0.226 0.260 262 9
9 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.131 0.060 0.122 0.175 313 17
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.119 0.061 0.124 0.124 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.176 0.062 0.124 0.124 - 0
12 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.070 0.066 0.133 0.133 - 0
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.095 0.068 0.135 0.135 - 0
14 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.200 0.069 0.145 0.145 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.141 0.071 0.140 0.140 - 0
16 Cisco  0:00:00  0.000  0.081 0.080 0.156 0.156 - 0
17 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.116 0.082 0.165 0.165 - 0
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.198 0.082 0.169 0.169 - 0
19 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.149 0.084 0.173 0.173 - -
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.394 0.084 0.171 0.171 - 0
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.167 0.113 0.225 0.338 145 16
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.188 0.121 0.193 0.194 - -
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.522  0.091 0.066 0.784 1.574 84 67
24 unknown  0:00:00  0.522  0.154 0.090 0.190 0.398 222 46
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.652  0.120 0.064 0.154 0.303 264 39
26 unknown  0:00:00  0.652  0.080 0.066 0.131 0.137 505 3
27 unknown  0:00:00  0.652  0.133 0.088 0.177 0.177 - -
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.780  0.144 0.016 1.396 1.537 673 95
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.780  0.152 0.022 0.535 0.604 639 44
30 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.909  0.224 0.017 0.047 0.147 573 58
31 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.909  0.131 0.073 0.150 0.449 209 63
32 Linux  0:00:00  1.040  0.296 0.011 0.199 0.382 244 45
33 Linux  0:00:00  1.297  0.178 0.112 0.263 0.578 80 25
34 Linux  0:00:00  1.550  0.168 0.066 0.124 0.440 377 119
35 Linux  0:00:00  2.311  0.237 0.015 0.178 0.178 - 0
36 Linux  0:00:00  2.564  0.139 0.016 0.183 0.401 85 19
37 Linux  0:00:00  2.564  0.189 0.083 0.340 0.680 305 104
38 Linux  0:00:00  2.571  0.148 0.179 2.310 3.226 81 74
39 Linux  0:19:54  7.862  0.144 0.078 0.194 0.194 - 0
40 Linux  1:06:37  23.835  0.300 0.081 0.419 0.784 145 53
 

Report from 27-Jul-2015 10:20 till 28-Jul-2015 10:14

Generated on 28-Jul-2015 10:22

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Zurich/Qube, Amsterdam/Webair and New York/New York Internet-2. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.