Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 42 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order. Click the site name to see graphs of site performance. FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 www.nyi.net New York Internet unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.218 0.018 0.039 0.103 826 53
2 www.datapipe.net Datapipe FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.109 0.019 0.040 0.060 434 9
3 www.qubenet.net Qube Managed Services Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.083 0.034 0.073 0.073 - 0
4 www.serverbeach.com www.serverbeach.com unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.113 0.046 0.627 0.665 1138 43
5 www.hyve.co.uk Hyve Managed Hosting Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.203 0.061 0.122 0.124 2464 3
6 www.xilo.net XILO Communications Ltd. Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.191 0.064 0.128 0.189 229 14
7 www.memset.com Memset Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.111 0.065 0.149 0.257 320 34
8 www.everycity.co.uk EveryCity unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.065 0.065 0.131 0.131 - 0
9 www.netcetera.co.uk Netcetera Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.047 0.066 0.158 0.292 170 23
10 krystal.co.uk krystal.co.uk Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.114 0.067 0.150 0.150 - 0
11 www.heartinternet.co.uk Heart Internet Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.208 0.067 0.135 0.135 - -
12 www.leaseweb.com LeaseWeb unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.085 0.069 0.449 0.449 - 0
13 www.serverstack.com ServerStack Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.074 0.071 0.140 0.140 - 0
14 www.hosteurope.de Host Europe Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.130 0.071 0.169 0.170 - -
15 www.logicworks.net Logicworks Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.124 0.071 0.148 0.337 286 54
16 www.swishmail.com Swishmail FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.125 0.073 0.144 0.189 370 17
17 www.inetu.net INetU Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.119 0.074 0.220 0.552 213 71
18 www.pair.com Pair Networks FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.212 0.076 0.156 0.537 77 29
19 one.com One.com unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.162 0.082 0.247 0.248 - 0
20 www.reliableservers.com ReliableServers.com Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.203 0.084 0.165 0.211 244 11
21 www.singlehop.com SingleHop Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.232 0.084 0.535 1.177 96 62
22 www.choopa.com www.choopa.com Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.209 0.085 0.174 0.222 307 15
23 www.aspserveur.com Aspserveur Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.284 0.088 0.372 0.703 163 54
24 www.dinahosting.com www.dinahosting.com Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.237 0.090 0.181 0.181 - 0
25 www.hivelocity.net Hivelocity Hosting unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.108 0.094 0.189 0.189 - -
26 www.arvixe.com www.arvixe.com Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.275 0.102 0.346 1.102 288 218
27 www.serverintellect.com Server Intellect Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.059 0.112 0.227 0.568 160 55
28 www.anexia.at Anexia Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.144 0.114 0.411 0.700 76 22
29 www.colocationamerica.com Colocation America Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.174 0.114 1.016 1.398 239 91
30 www.multacom.com Multacom Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.182 0.116 0.230 0.343 143 16
31 www.hosting4less.com Hosting 4 Less Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.168 0.119 0.242 0.425 149 27
32 www.kattare.com Kattare Internet Services Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.160 0.120 0.242 0.502 91 24
33 www.midphase.com Midphase Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.234 0.120 0.242 0.491 174 43
34 www.cwcs.co.uk CWCS Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.196 0.135 0.226 0.232 - -
35 www.webair.com Webair Internet Development Linux  0:00:00  0.581  0.183 0.071 0.142 0.258 301 35
36 www.bigstep.com Bigstep Linux  0:00:00  0.691  0.262 0.059 0.121 0.121 - 0
37 www.godaddy.com GoDaddy.com Inc Linux  0:00:00  0.693  0.140 0.009 0.281 0.332 1366 70
38 www.codero.com Codero Citrix Netscaler  0:00:00  0.693  0.156 0.104 0.476 1.432 75 71
39 www.peer1.com www.peer1.com unknown  0:00:00  1.155  0.113 0.014 1.442 1.547 833 87
40 www.aruba.it Aruba Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  6.071  0.126 0.087 0.243 1.064 90 74
41 www.iomarthosting.com Iomart Linux  0:00:00  39.607  0.105 0.092 0.182 6.538 5 31
42 www.rackspace.com Rackspace F5 BIG-IP  23:38:16  100.000  - - - - - -
Report from 29-Jul-2014 06:50 till 30-Jul-2014 06:44
Generated on 30-Jul-2014 06:52

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.