Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 43 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.120 0.010 1.288 1.396 793 86
2 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.076 0.014 0.029 0.044 584 9
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.261 0.015 0.033 0.125 568 52
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.118 0.019 0.293 0.344 1227 62
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.080 0.020 0.043 0.043 - 0
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.176 0.050 0.100 0.102 1640 3
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.218 0.051 0.105 0.105 - 0
8 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.073 0.052 0.105 0.106 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.093 0.052 0.132 0.209 447 34
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.100 0.054 0.125 0.125 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.205 0.056 0.111 0.111 - -
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.149 0.057 0.111 0.186 332 25
13 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.081 0.057 0.375 0.375 - 0
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.131 0.062 0.122 0.214 380 35
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.122 0.065 0.153 0.153 - -
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.124 0.069 0.146 0.331 291 54
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.103 0.069 0.355 0.580 97 22
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.084 0.072 0.142 0.142 - 0
19 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.093 0.072 0.156 0.861 104 74
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.164 0.074 0.152 0.152 - 0
21 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.113 0.074 0.145 0.186 409 17
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.239 0.081 0.363 0.666 178 54
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.142 0.082 0.160 0.160 - 0
24 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.140 0.084 0.233 0.553 221 71
25 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.113 0.084 0.293 0.611 149 47
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.236 0.086 0.565 1.672 54 60
27 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.134 0.106 0.204 0.204 - -
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.200 0.115 0.187 0.187 - -
29 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.058 0.123 0.252 0.631 144 55
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.171 0.126 0.250 0.376 130 16
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.229 0.129 0.264 0.502 159 38
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.181 0.129 0.260 0.544 84 24
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.171 0.132 0.596 0.923 199 65
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.177 0.136 0.264 0.264 - 0
35 unknown  0:00:00  0.652  0.184 0.071 0.207 0.207 - 0
36 Linux  0:00:00  1.042  0.267 0.105 0.348 1.125 280 218
37 unknown  0:00:00  1.550  0.139 0.010 0.536 0.565 1460 43
38 unknown  0:00:00  1.558  0.182 0.121 0.514 1.581 67 72
39 Linux  0:00:00  2.067  0.086 0.079 0.158 1.228 28 30
40 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  2.564  0.052 0.059 0.130 0.236 219 23
41 Linux  0:15:00  4.545  0.167 0.088 0.166 0.206 276 11
42 Linux  0:15:00  5.639  0.131 0.076 0.162 0.208 323 15
43 FreeBSD  0:15:00  7.956  0.217 0.080 0.169 0.582 71 29
Report from 20-Aug-2014 13:56 till 21-Aug-2014 13:56
Generated on 21-Aug-2014 14:02

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.