Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.095 0.012 0.171 0.172 15249 1
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.136 0.013 1.245 1.366 726 88
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.134 0.016 0.512 0.553 991 41
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.087 0.019 0.036 0.050 651 9
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.241 0.025 0.053 0.152 542 54
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.107 0.037 0.078 0.078 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.187 0.059 0.119 0.256 298 41
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.202 0.062 0.141 0.141 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.127 0.063 0.124 0.124 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.163 0.069 0.143 0.184 276 11
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.158 0.069 0.151 0.192 357 15
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.206 0.070 0.138 0.234 247 24
13 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.144 0.073 0.153 0.201 349 17
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.085 0.076 0.151 0.151 - 0
15 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.258 0.079 0.160 0.923 97 74
16 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.225 0.084 0.258 0.258 - 0
17 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.224 0.085 0.171 0.552 77 30
18 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.155 0.090 0.184 0.476 160 47
19 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.068 0.092 0.180 0.180 - 0
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.244 0.093 0.182 0.182 - 0
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.278 0.098 0.682 1.127 232 103
22 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.174 0.102 0.622 0.950 207 68
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.217 0.137 0.225 0.230 - -
24 unknown  0:00:00  0.465  0.087 0.065 0.130 0.130 - 0
25 unknown  0:00:00  0.465  0.155 0.108 0.216 0.216 - -
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.578  0.139 0.077 0.154 0.154 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.578  0.283 0.114 0.228 0.228 - 0
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.170 0.025 0.098 0.098 - 0
29 unknown  0:00:00  0.579  0.268 0.058 0.115 0.116 2618 3
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.140 0.065 0.149 0.257 320 35
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.110 0.070 0.166 0.166 - -
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.368 0.102 0.431 0.688 82 21
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.194 0.129 0.286 0.609 74 24
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.695  0.305 0.013 0.045 0.097 948 49
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.807  0.134 0.016 0.228 0.228 - 0
36 Linux  0:00:00  1.152  0.271 0.078 0.157 0.157 - -
37 Linux  0:00:00  1.153  0.142 0.075 0.159 0.348 294 56
38 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  1.153  0.124 0.076 0.201 0.431 149 34
39 Linux  0:00:00  1.378  0.227 0.179 0.329 0.489 101 16
40 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  1.718  0.119 0.086 0.174 0.433 90 23
41 Linux  0:00:00  21.135  0.241 0.371 0.879 1.936 57 60
 

Report from 23-Nov-2014 17:40 till 24-Nov-2014 17:34

Generated on 24-Nov-2014 17:41

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.