Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 44 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.115 0.010 0.271 0.321 1263 64
2 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.087 0.014 0.030 0.044 584 9
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.076 0.021 0.043 0.043 - 0
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.175 0.050 0.100 0.101 2514 3
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.076 0.051 0.102 0.102 - 0
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.143 0.055 0.127 0.127 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.210 0.056 0.112 0.112 - -
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.140 0.063 0.163 0.165 - -
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.234 0.063 0.116 0.116 - 0
10 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.159 0.063 0.164 0.287 285 35
11 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.096 0.068 0.139 0.866 101 74
12 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.122 0.069 0.139 0.180 410 17
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.144 0.070 0.150 0.343 280 54
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.077 0.072 0.145 0.145 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.141 0.072 0.158 0.200 350 15
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.159 0.073 0.151 0.194 261 11
17 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.134 0.085 0.234 0.561 216 71
18 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.099 0.088 0.309 0.621 151 47
19 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.131 0.099 0.198 0.198 - -
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.256 0.102 0.341 1.090 293 220
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.185 0.124 0.575 0.911 196 66
22 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.064 0.124 0.254 0.633 144 55
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.173 0.125 0.251 0.377 129 16
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.202 0.145 0.274 0.274 - 0
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.174 0.205 0.285 0.286 - -
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.261  0.233 0.088 0.571 1.650 56 60
27 unknown  0:00:00  0.391  0.088 0.025 0.151 0.151 2886 1
28 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.391  0.057 0.056 0.120 0.227 216 23
29 unknown  0:00:00  0.391  0.172 0.129 0.680 1.062 190 73
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.391  0.264 0.137 0.263 0.510 152 38
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.392  0.104 0.052 0.122 0.198 450 34
32 unknown  0:00:00  0.392  0.079 0.057 0.363 0.363 - 0
33 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.522  0.211 0.084 0.170 0.610 67 29
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.649  0.200 0.074 0.158 0.158 - 0
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.780  0.183 0.053 0.107 0.182 336 25
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.781  0.125 0.078 0.156 0.156 - 0
37 Linux  0:00:00  1.035  0.319 0.073 0.375 0.682 176 54
38 unknown  0:00:00  1.038  0.137 0.016 0.034 0.092 907 52
39 Linux  0:00:00  1.039  0.177 0.129 0.258 0.538 85 24
40 Linux  0:00:00  1.043  0.270 0.090 0.350 0.628 79 22
41 Linux  0:00:00  1.167  0.100 0.042 0.649 0.698 880 43
42 unknown  0:00:00  1.552  0.128 0.025 1.358 1.490 641 85
43 unknown  1:03:11  16.457  0.207 0.067 0.215 0.215 - 0
44 Linux  10:22:36  85.327  0.094 0.079 0.171 5.575 6 30
 

Report from 1-Sep-2014 16:35 till 2-Sep-2014 16:31

Generated on 2-Sep-2014 16:43

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.