Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 43 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.070 0.063 0.129 0.129 - 0
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.148 0.065 0.147 0.147 - 0
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.197 0.067 0.134 0.134 - 0
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.072 0.071 0.493 1.425 72 67
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.128 0.074 0.167 0.167 - -
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.126 0.081 0.167 0.374 278 58
7 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.000  0.124 0.085 0.231 0.462 130 30
8 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.055 0.090 0.175 0.175 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.405 0.093 0.179 0.179 - 0
10 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.116 0.101 0.234 0.234 - -
11 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.139 0.112 0.241 0.241 - -
12 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.577  0.209 0.031 0.073 0.225 377 57
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.121 0.015 0.031 0.043 725 9
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.228 0.081 0.161 0.162 - -
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.694  0.320 0.072 0.143 0.143 - 0
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.694  0.232 0.086 0.182 0.182 - 0
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.922  0.245 0.119 0.236 0.236 - 0
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.923  0.068 0.079 0.154 0.154 - 0
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.923  0.142 0.081 0.159 0.159 - 0
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.924  0.198 0.149 0.316 0.662 69 24
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.925  0.092 0.043 0.084 0.084 - 0
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.925  0.268 0.078 0.412 0.739 169 55
23 unknown  0:00:00  0.925  0.183 0.127 0.814 1.055 167 40
24 unknown  0:00:00  1.148  0.233 0.088 0.256 0.256 - 0
25 Linux  0:00:00  1.149  0.179 0.117 0.235 0.362 128 16
26 Linux  0:00:00  1.152  0.180 0.027 0.062 0.062 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  1.152  0.170 0.074 0.145 0.145 - 0
28 FreeBSD  0:00:00  1.378  0.126 0.077 0.157 0.202 370 17
29 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  1.379  0.111 0.076 0.152 0.370 109 24
30 Linux  0:00:00  1.381  0.117 0.062 0.137 0.137 - 0
31 unknown  0:00:00  1.381  0.228 0.063 0.129 0.132 1025 3
32 Linux  0:00:00  1.381  0.148 0.069 0.154 0.275 315 38
33 Linux  0:00:00  1.381  0.306 0.072 0.144 0.145 - 0
34 Linux  0:00:00  1.381  0.244 0.073 0.147 0.147 - -
35 FreeBSD  0:00:00  1.381  0.212 0.077 0.164 0.590 76 32
36 Linux  0:00:00  1.381  0.226 0.086 0.172 0.172 - 0
37 Linux  0:00:00  1.382  0.289 0.101 0.608 0.974 287 105
38 Linux  0:00:00  1.384  0.282 0.010 0.040 0.099 839 49
39 Linux  0:00:00  1.722  0.101 0.023 0.207 0.207 28163 1
40 Linux  0:00:00  2.286  0.114 0.020 1.184 1.313 674 87
41 Linux  0:00:00  2.841  0.125 0.020 0.510 0.560 824 41
42 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  4.049  0.161 0.106 0.182 0.425 179 43
43 Linux  0:00:00  16.800  0.125 0.011 0.190 0.190 - 0
 

Report from 26-Feb-2015 05:51 till 27-Feb-2015 05:49

Generated on 27-Feb-2015 05:57

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.