Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 42 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.279 0.013 0.028 0.069 1209 49
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.249 0.017 0.067 0.140 720 53
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.168 0.026 0.053 0.053 - 0
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.105 0.038 0.079 0.079 - 0
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.238 0.059 0.118 0.119 2622 3
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.145 0.060 0.122 0.122 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.180 0.061 0.123 0.259 300 41
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.136 0.063 0.142 0.143 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.193 0.064 0.130 0.211 232 19
10 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.070 0.069 0.135 0.135 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.116 0.071 0.164 0.278 304 35
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.172 0.073 0.151 0.193 263 11
13 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.236 0.073 0.150 0.523 79 30
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.082 0.074 0.149 0.149 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.138 0.080 0.157 0.157 - 0
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.232 0.081 0.574 1.786 53 64
17 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.154 0.082 0.254 0.254 - 0
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.271 0.084 0.155 0.155 - -
19 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.135 0.087 0.283 0.598 147 46
20 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.139 0.088 0.177 0.929 96 72
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.309 0.088 0.385 0.654 79 21
22 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.170 0.109 1.009 1.354 191 66
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.250 0.110 0.224 0.456 175 41
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.193 0.124 0.250 0.512 91 24
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.204 0.149 0.298 0.450 107 16
26 unknown  0:00:00  0.349  0.084 0.065 0.132 0.132 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.349  0.144 0.074 0.178 0.179 - -
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.349  0.215 0.147 0.302 0.732 154 66
29 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.465  0.115 0.022 0.041 0.060 457 9
30 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.465  0.160 0.074 0.204 0.489 173 49
31 unknown  0:00:00  0.465  0.141 0.104 0.207 0.207 - -
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.465  0.207 0.177 0.264 0.270 - -
33 unknown  0:00:00  0.578  0.119 0.046 0.524 0.578 760 41
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.580  0.171 0.081 0.163 0.208 329 15
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.581  0.225 0.082 0.167 0.167 - 0
36 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.693  0.134 0.069 0.138 0.182 384 17
37 unknown  0:00:00  0.694  0.104 0.038 0.227 0.228 1763 1
38 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.923  0.130 0.079 0.160 0.391 99 23
39 Linux  0:00:00  0.924  0.290 0.099 0.340 0.790 232 104
40 Linux  0:00:00  1.156  0.108 0.009 0.185 0.185 - 0
41 Linux  0:00:00  1.387  0.143 0.068 0.147 0.337 294 56
42 unknown  0:00:00  2.281  0.118 0.026 1.171 1.285 740 85
 

Report from 24-Oct-2014 06:55 till 25-Oct-2014 06:55

Generated on 25-Oct-2014 07:03

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.