Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.287 0.008 0.024 0.058 1431 49
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.157 0.013 0.219 0.219 - 0
3 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.080 0.016 0.033 0.050 505 9
4 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.204 0.017 0.037 0.105 764 52
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.135 0.023 0.495 0.529 1192 41
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.178 0.031 0.062 0.062 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.103 0.041 0.081 0.081 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.239 0.058 0.116 0.117 2630 3
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.135 0.059 0.121 0.121 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.125 0.062 0.140 0.140 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.199 0.063 0.128 0.227 243 24
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.190 0.064 0.127 0.264 298 41
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.117 0.068 0.166 0.275 317 35
14 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.073 0.068 0.133 0.133 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.220 0.069 0.139 0.139 - -
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.112 0.070 0.177 0.178 - -
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.167 0.071 0.155 0.199 334 15
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.174 0.072 0.151 0.194 257 11
19 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.202 0.074 0.158 0.528 80 30
20 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.133 0.075 0.207 0.516 177 55
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.082 0.075 0.150 0.150 - 0
22 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.057 0.076 0.143 0.143 - 0
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.132 0.077 0.153 0.153 - 0
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.200 0.079 0.161 0.161 - -
25 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.124 0.081 0.283 0.580 153 46
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.241 0.083 0.169 0.169 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.400 0.095 0.415 0.653 88 21
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.284 0.098 0.486 0.928 234 104
29 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.153 0.101 0.755 1.081 202 66
30 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.153 0.106 0.211 0.211 - -
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.184 0.118 0.233 0.351 137 16
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.174 0.119 0.239 0.502 91 24
33 unknown  0:00:00  0.348  0.094 0.037 0.237 0.237 1852 1
34 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.464  0.119 0.079 0.162 0.392 99 23
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.578  0.173 0.083 0.168 0.359 293 56
36 unknown  0:00:00  0.579  0.099 0.012 1.169 1.279 766 85
37 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.579  0.114 0.080 0.163 0.936 94 72
38 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.694  0.153 0.071 0.139 0.183 381 17
39 Linux  0:00:00  0.923  0.227 0.139 0.257 0.503 166 41
40 unknown  0:00:00  1.152  0.197 0.081 0.246 0.246 - 0
41 Linux  0:00:00  8.872  0.227 0.283 0.650 1.585 42 39
 

Report from 30-Oct-2014 10:36 till 31-Oct-2014 10:30

Generated on 31-Oct-2014 10:38

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.