Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.119 0.009 0.211 0.211 - 0
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.070 0.011 0.167 0.167 19749 1
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.128 0.011 1.288 1.407 737 88
4 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.132 0.012 0.520 0.573 774 41
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.299 0.012 0.033 0.081 1008 49
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.110 0.020 0.037 0.051 620 9
7 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.221 0.024 0.053 0.153 535 53
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.177 0.025 0.057 0.057 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.094 0.038 0.078 0.078 - 0
10 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.230 0.058 0.116 0.118 1733 3
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.133 0.059 0.120 0.120 - 0
12 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.079 0.064 0.129 0.129 - 0
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.202 0.065 0.129 0.228 257 26
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.122 0.067 0.151 0.260 320 35
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.137 0.068 0.149 0.189 368 15
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.144 0.068 0.144 0.187 261 11
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.138 0.068 0.150 0.341 293 56
18 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.170 0.069 0.138 0.188 336 17
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.100 0.070 0.165 0.165 - -
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.149 0.073 0.146 0.146 - 0
21 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.000  0.114 0.074 0.149 0.365 110 24
22 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.216 0.074 0.153 0.530 78 30
23 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.054 0.077 0.154 0.154 - 0
24 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.145 0.078 0.202 0.433 147 34
25 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.118 0.080 0.178 0.977 93 74
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.104 0.082 0.157 0.157 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.220 0.085 0.173 0.173 - 0
28 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.140 0.086 0.175 0.465 161 47
29 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.244 0.093 0.263 0.264 - 0
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.388 0.094 0.428 0.686 81 21
31 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.164 0.101 0.635 0.957 211 68
32 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.154 0.103 0.206 0.206 - -
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.193 0.106 0.197 0.202 - -
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.237 0.111 0.224 0.224 - 0
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.210 0.123 0.283 0.607 74 24
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.171 0.125 0.234 0.461 180 41
37 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.218 0.152 0.301 0.450 109 16
38 Linux  0:00:00  0.696  0.300 0.096 0.606 1.058 229 103
39 Linux  0:00:00  5.034  0.111 0.064 0.145 0.145 - 0
40 Linux  0:00:00  5.568  0.235 0.076 0.149 0.149 - -
41 Linux  0:00:00  32.775  0.243 1.323 1.770 2.620 61 52
 

Report from 27-Nov-2014 20:06 till 28-Nov-2014 20:03

Generated on 28-Nov-2014 20:10

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.