Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.308 0.009 0.026 0.059 1518 49
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.220 0.010 0.192 0.192 - 0
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.248 0.016 0.034 0.104 750 52
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.107 0.023 0.046 0.046 - 0
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.154 0.024 0.051 0.051 - 0
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.076 0.051 0.105 0.105 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.098 0.052 0.130 0.207 445 34
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.134 0.052 0.107 0.107 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.187 0.053 0.107 0.182 321 24
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.097 0.053 0.123 0.123 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.210 0.056 0.113 0.113 - -
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.200 0.057 0.110 0.111 2478 3
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.094 0.058 0.150 0.150 - -
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.189 0.066 0.134 0.135 - -
15 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.109 0.068 0.144 0.862 101 73
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.158 0.070 0.148 0.335 289 54
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.175 0.070 0.129 0.256 323 41
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.152 0.073 0.158 0.201 346 15
19 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.142 0.073 0.142 0.183 409 17
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.096 0.074 0.146 0.147 - 0
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.229 0.075 0.153 0.154 - 0
22 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.254 0.078 0.161 0.563 73 29
23 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.137 0.080 0.225 0.478 135 34
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.170 0.082 0.162 0.206 259 11
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.144 0.083 0.163 0.163 - 0
26 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.140 0.099 0.197 0.197 - -
27 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.195 0.116 0.680 1.047 199 73
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.268 0.121 0.245 0.493 164 41
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.191 0.127 0.251 0.376 130 16
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.200 0.136 0.269 0.624 186 66
31 unknown  0:00:00  0.521  0.234 0.069 0.208 0.208 - 0
32 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.521  0.088 0.071 0.140 0.255 201 23
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.522  0.203 0.128 0.258 0.539 85 24
34 unknown  0:00:00  0.648  0.114 0.010 0.529 0.562 1338 43
35 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.650  0.097 0.014 0.030 0.045 577 9
36 Linux  0:00:00  1.038  0.275 0.078 0.388 0.633 89 22
37 Linux  0:00:00  1.170  0.248 0.088 0.587 1.815 49 60
38 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  1.170  0.137 0.089 0.283 0.609 142 46
39 unknown  0:00:00  1.546  0.071 0.009 0.148 0.148 14953 1
40 unknown  0:00:00  1.935  0.137 0.022 1.200 1.311 760 85
41 Linux  0:37:52  6.329  0.287 0.110 0.373 1.116 291 216
 

Report from 30-Sep-2014 14:11 till 1-Oct-2014 14:11

Generated on 1-Oct-2014 14:15

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.