Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 43 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.276 0.010 0.134 0.270 359 49
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.140 0.011 0.186 0.186 - 0
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.153 0.018 0.040 0.109 755 52
4 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.100 0.019 0.034 0.049 577 9
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.079 0.021 0.043 0.043 - 0
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.188 0.049 0.099 0.101 1508 3
7 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.045 0.051 0.122 0.229 216 23
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.114 0.052 0.106 0.106 - 0
9 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.077 0.053 0.107 0.107 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.138 0.057 0.126 0.127 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.179 0.059 0.123 0.201 323 25
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.090 0.060 0.147 0.147 - -
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.122 0.062 0.134 0.227 369 34
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.187 0.062 0.125 0.125 - -
15 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.134 0.063 0.154 0.281 294 37
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.252 0.069 0.326 0.548 98 22
17 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.121 0.070 0.140 0.183 392 17
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.280 0.070 0.328 0.635 176 54
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.154 0.073 0.150 0.338 287 54
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.245 0.075 0.155 0.155 - 0
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.096 0.075 0.150 0.150 - 0
22 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.133 0.075 0.214 0.453 143 34
23 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.221 0.080 0.165 0.579 71 30
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.248 0.087 0.602 1.686 57 61
25 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.133 0.099 0.203 0.203 - -
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.278 0.100 0.347 1.094 296 221
27 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.187 0.118 0.662 1.030 197 73
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.240 0.125 0.255 0.515 154 40
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.190 0.131 0.263 0.551 83 24
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.177 0.140 0.273 0.273 - 0
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.184 0.196 0.271 0.272 - -
32 unknown  0:00:00  0.393  0.051 0.007 0.133 0.133 10343 1
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.520  0.135 0.082 0.160 0.160 - 0
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.520  0.173 0.123 0.267 0.616 186 65
35 unknown  0:00:00  0.521  0.168 0.033 0.062 0.062 - 0
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.522  0.171 0.073 0.154 0.196 263 11
37 unknown  0:00:00  0.649  0.174 0.070 0.202 0.202 - 0
38 Linux  0:00:00  0.649  0.162 0.074 0.160 0.203 349 15
39 Linux  0:00:00  0.649  0.184 0.128 0.253 0.380 127 16
40 unknown  0:00:00  1.040  0.133 0.008 0.560 0.588 1558 43
41 unknown  0:00:00  1.295  0.140 0.011 1.287 1.396 775 85
42 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  1.928  0.103 0.069 0.150 0.863 103 74
43 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  2.314  0.127 0.098 0.294 0.605 150 47
 

Report from 16-Sep-2014 21:36 till 17-Sep-2014 21:30

Generated on 17-Sep-2014 21:37

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.