Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 40 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.289 0.012 0.039 0.089 978 49
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.137 0.013 0.204 0.204 - 0
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.152 0.014 1.226 1.345 741 88
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.111 0.019 0.035 0.049 649 9
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.256 0.022 0.047 0.131 636 54
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.095 0.037 0.075 0.075 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.133 0.059 0.137 0.137 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.236 0.062 0.141 0.141 - 0
9 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.076 0.064 0.130 0.130 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.140 0.066 0.156 0.264 319 35
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.162 0.071 0.158 0.200 354 15
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.114 0.074 0.173 0.184 - -
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.288 0.075 0.150 0.150 - -
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.082 0.076 0.150 0.150 - 0
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.171 0.077 0.153 0.193 279 11
16 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.216 0.078 0.157 0.535 78 30
17 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.149 0.082 0.168 0.469 155 47
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.250 0.087 0.632 1.699 59 63
19 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.057 0.089 0.171 0.171 - 0
20 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.146 0.091 0.217 0.462 140 34
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.348 0.095 0.392 0.647 82 21
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.279 0.099 0.589 1.036 231 103
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.261 0.103 0.195 0.195 - 0
24 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.171 0.105 0.639 0.960 212 68
25 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.170 0.105 0.214 0.214 - -
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.184 0.123 0.278 0.608 72 24
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.280 0.123 0.242 0.242 - 0
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.215 0.154 0.303 0.469 98 16
29 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.348  0.267 0.078 0.160 0.925 97 74
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.463  0.144 0.084 0.159 0.159 - 0
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.578  0.273 0.066 0.131 0.137 504 3
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.578  0.228 0.088 0.176 0.180 - -
33 unknown  0:00:00  0.579  0.129 0.013 0.496 0.528 1255 41
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.579  0.175 0.025 0.051 0.051 - 0
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.694  0.181 0.063 0.123 0.264 290 41
36 unknown  0:00:00  0.923  0.107 0.017 0.192 0.192 2103 1
37 FreeBSD  0:00:00  1.379  0.148 0.084 0.156 0.200 375 17
38 unknown  0:00:00  1.379  0.215 0.087 0.258 0.258 - 0
39 Linux  0:00:00  1.720  0.139 0.068 0.141 0.328 298 56
40 Windows Server 2008  0:18:36  7.634  0.117 0.096 0.190 0.456 87 23
 

Report from 22-Nov-2014 14:25 till 23-Nov-2014 14:25

Generated on 23-Nov-2014 14:30

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.