Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 43 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.266 0.008 0.017 0.044 1765 49
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.149 0.009 0.133 0.133 17005 1
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.141 0.010 0.187 0.187 - 0
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.119 0.013 1.290 1.397 792 85
5 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.087 0.015 0.030 0.045 575 9
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.064 0.021 0.042 0.042 - 0
7 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.173 0.031 0.065 0.065 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.181 0.049 0.099 0.100 2469 3
9 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.159 0.051 0.101 0.101 - 0
10 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.044 0.051 0.118 0.223 220 23
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.118 0.052 0.106 0.106 - 0
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.164 0.052 0.104 0.177 345 25
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.101 0.052 0.118 0.196 442 34
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.091 0.056 0.135 0.136 - -
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.171 0.057 0.113 0.113 - -
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.101 0.061 0.131 0.131 - 0
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.160 0.066 0.126 0.270 283 41
18 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.172 0.067 0.205 0.205 - 0
19 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.112 0.068 0.137 0.178 411 17
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.247 0.069 0.360 0.659 180 54
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.141 0.071 0.150 0.333 295 54
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.149 0.073 0.158 0.201 347 15
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.158 0.073 0.152 0.194 265 11
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.073 0.074 0.147 0.147 - 0
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.266 0.079 0.344 0.580 93 22
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.205 0.079 0.155 0.155 - 0
27 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.215 0.080 0.162 0.553 75 29
28 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.128 0.084 0.309 0.616 151 46
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.237 0.089 0.589 1.674 57 61
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.128 0.097 0.176 0.176 - 0
31 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.133 0.101 0.201 0.202 - -
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.271 0.103 0.345 1.084 299 221
33 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.187 0.116 0.668 1.039 196 73
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.244 0.122 0.245 0.496 160 40
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.208 0.122 0.259 0.607 187 65
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.196 0.131 0.256 0.394 117 16
37 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.180 0.132 0.261 0.544 84 24
38 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.181 0.140 0.280 0.280 - 0
39 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.166 0.154 0.224 0.224 - -
40 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.523  0.129 0.078 0.213 0.452 143 34
41 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.653  0.107 0.074 0.150 0.895 99 74
42 unknown  0:00:00  0.783  0.138 0.028 0.049 0.115 797 52
43 unknown  0:00:00  1.300  0.112 0.007 0.532 0.567 1216 43
 

Report from 20-Sep-2014 08:00 till 21-Sep-2014 07:55

Generated on 21-Sep-2014 08:05

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.