Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 39 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.095 0.010 0.152 0.152 - 0
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.070 0.012 0.025 0.033 1043 9
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.208 0.023 0.051 0.051 - 0
4 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.205 0.025 0.052 0.155 555 57
5 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.076 0.044 0.089 0.089 - 0
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.127 0.055 0.215 0.215 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.119 0.060 0.123 0.123 - 0
8 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.116 0.061 0.126 0.158 518 17
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.191 0.061 0.123 0.123 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.063 0.063 0.523 1.327 83 67
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.108 0.063 0.132 0.311 335 60
12 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.212 0.063 0.127 0.129 1907 3
13 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.102 0.064 0.128 0.129 - 0
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.260 0.064 0.130 0.130 - 0
15 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.120 0.064 0.133 0.133 - -
16 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.000  0.102 0.066 0.183 0.387 150 31
17 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.132 0.068 0.182 0.303 305 37
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.118 0.068 0.136 0.136 - 0
19 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.198 0.068 0.146 0.522 90 34
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.130 0.070 0.156 0.156 - 0
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.072 0.070 0.136 0.136 - 0
22 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.053 0.082 0.165 0.165 - 0
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.189 0.083 0.168 0.168 - 0
24 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.210 0.085 0.166 0.168 - -
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.253 0.086 0.389 0.710 339 109
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.258 0.087 0.401 0.723 164 53
27 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.115 0.090 0.180 0.180 - -
28 Citrix Netscaler  0:00:00  0.000  0.151 0.092 0.202 0.394 204 39
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.651 0.095 0.187 0.187 - 0
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.176 0.097 0.188 0.188 - 0
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.159 0.108 0.213 0.316 158 16
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.167 0.121 0.268 0.579 81 25
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.777  0.078 0.013 0.219 0.219 25390 1
34 Linux  0:00:00  1.034  0.138 0.010 1.051 1.159 802 87
35 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  1.034  0.143 0.079 0.172 0.172 - -
36 Linux  0:00:00  2.051  0.125 0.011 0.449 0.484 1199 41
37 Linux  0:00:00  2.302  0.249 0.005 0.209 0.416 215 45
38 Linux  0:00:00  3.046  0.231 0.064 0.129 0.129 - 0
39 Linux  0:00:00  4.517  0.093 0.014 0.189 0.372 105 19
 

Report from 20-Apr-2015 13:06 till 21-Apr-2015 13:02

Generated on 21-Apr-2015 13:08

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.