Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.097 0.008 0.136 0.136 19489 1
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.142 0.009 0.180 0.180 - 0
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.273 0.012 0.027 0.060 1508 49
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.083 0.021 0.043 0.043 - 0
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.154 0.023 0.042 0.143 520 52
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.166 0.025 0.055 0.055 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.222 0.051 0.102 0.104 1609 3
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.168 0.052 0.105 0.180 319 24
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.114 0.053 0.122 0.122 - 0
10 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.072 0.056 0.108 0.109 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.214 0.057 0.113 0.113 - -
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.097 0.057 0.138 0.218 431 34
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.089 0.057 0.144 0.144 - -
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.143 0.058 0.116 0.239 330 41
15 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.108 0.068 0.140 0.841 103 73
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.331 0.072 0.370 0.604 93 22
17 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.142 0.074 0.145 0.188 393 17
18 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.244 0.078 0.162 0.561 74 29
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.282 0.078 0.155 0.155 - 0
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.095 0.079 0.153 0.153 - 0
21 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.137 0.079 0.214 0.470 133 34
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.183 0.082 0.154 0.154 - -
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.140 0.084 0.176 0.176 - 0
24 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.133 0.090 0.297 0.624 141 46
25 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.185 0.119 0.674 1.054 193 73
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.191 0.126 0.251 0.379 127 16
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.246 0.130 0.257 0.511 159 40
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.194 0.134 0.266 0.550 84 24
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.170 0.136 0.218 0.259 273 11
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.391  0.188 0.129 0.261 0.620 184 66
31 unknown  0:00:00  0.520  0.140 0.099 0.201 0.202 - -
32 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.522  0.092 0.056 0.129 0.244 201 23
33 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.649  0.110 0.019 0.035 0.050 572 9
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.784  0.260 0.091 0.624 1.799 52 61
35 unknown  0:00:00  1.034  0.264 0.081 0.246 0.246 - 0
36 Linux  0:00:00  1.035  0.288 0.100 0.349 1.097 295 220
37 Linux  0:00:00  1.292  0.143 0.139 0.223 0.266 343 15
38 Linux  0:00:00  1.294  0.150 0.070 0.149 0.343 280 54
39 Linux  0:00:00  1.544  0.116 0.052 0.106 0.107 - 0
40 unknown  0:00:00  1.938  0.137 0.009 1.136 1.250 742 85
41 unknown  0:00:00  2.574  0.132 0.014 0.543 0.581 1135 43
 

Report from 29-Sep-2014 13:45 till 30-Sep-2014 13:43

Generated on 30-Sep-2014 13:49

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.