Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.118 0.009 0.210 0.210 - 0
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.071 0.012 0.170 0.170 20222 1
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.128 0.012 1.279 1.402 716 88
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.301 0.012 0.033 0.081 1007 49
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.131 0.016 0.524 0.579 748 41
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.108 0.021 0.038 0.052 627 9
7 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.225 0.024 0.053 0.152 538 53
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.179 0.025 0.057 0.057 - 0
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.090 0.037 0.076 0.076 - 0
10 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.235 0.058 0.116 0.118 1325 3
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.132 0.059 0.120 0.120 - 0
12 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.079 0.064 0.129 0.129 - 0
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.198 0.065 0.129 0.228 256 26
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.126 0.066 0.155 0.265 319 35
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.138 0.068 0.149 0.189 364 15
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.141 0.068 0.144 0.188 257 11
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.144 0.069 0.150 0.341 293 56
18 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.166 0.069 0.139 0.189 333 17
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.100 0.069 0.165 0.166 - -
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.150 0.073 0.147 0.147 - 0
21 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.213 0.074 0.153 0.531 78 30
22 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.000  0.115 0.074 0.149 0.365 110 24
23 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.055 0.076 0.153 0.153 - 0
24 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.145 0.078 0.203 0.437 146 34
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.102 0.082 0.157 0.157 - 0
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.217 0.085 0.172 0.172 - 0
27 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.143 0.089 0.179 0.475 157 47
28 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.240 0.093 0.264 0.264 - 0
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.386 0.097 0.432 0.690 81 21
30 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.165 0.102 0.637 0.960 210 68
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.201 0.105 0.195 0.201 - -
32 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.157 0.107 0.210 0.210 - -
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.238 0.111 0.225 0.225 - 0
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.210 0.124 0.286 0.613 73 24
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.170 0.125 0.234 0.463 178 41
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.219 0.153 0.301 0.454 106 16
37 Linux  0:00:00  0.578  0.304 0.095 0.586 1.038 228 103
38 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  2.724  0.118 0.090 0.183 0.980 93 74
39 Linux  0:00:00  4.049  0.106 0.063 0.145 0.145 - 0
40 Linux  0:00:00  5.562  0.236 0.076 0.149 0.149 - -
41 Linux  0:00:00  30.189  0.247 1.228 1.661 2.467 62 50
 

Report from 27-Nov-2014 17:55 till 28-Nov-2014 17:55

Generated on 28-Nov-2014 18:00

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.