Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.129 0.008 0.205 0.205 - 0
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.084 0.012 0.024 0.033 1054 9
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.059 0.014 0.168 0.169 8560 1
4 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.220 0.028 0.060 0.060 - 0
5 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.190 0.035 0.073 0.273 288 57
6 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.095 0.044 0.090 0.090 - 0
7 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.172 0.058 0.221 0.221 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.122 0.062 0.126 0.126 - 0
9 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.104 0.062 0.124 0.157 504 17
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.060 0.064 0.521 1.312 84 67
11 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.090 0.064 0.129 0.129 - 0
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.306 0.065 0.131 0.131 - 0
13 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.104 0.065 0.159 0.278 313 37
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.119 0.066 0.137 0.319 318 58
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.323 0.066 0.133 0.133 - 0
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.126 0.067 0.150 0.150 - 0
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.184 0.068 0.135 0.135 - 0
18 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.221 0.069 0.133 0.135 1202 3
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.126 0.069 0.139 0.139 - 0
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.067 0.071 0.139 0.139 - 0
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.199 0.073 0.144 0.144 - 0
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.206 0.075 0.151 0.151 - 0
23 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.108 0.077 0.180 0.180 - -
24 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.210 0.078 0.154 0.569 81 34
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.179 0.079 0.160 0.160 - -
26 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.000  0.108 0.080 0.214 0.461 124 31
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.196 0.082 0.166 0.166 - 0
28 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.654 0.091 0.183 0.183 - 0
29 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.128 0.091 0.182 0.182 - -
30 Citrix Netscaler  0:00:00  0.000  0.170 0.093 0.192 0.392 191 38
31 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.061 0.093 0.178 0.178 - 0
32 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.145 0.096 0.193 0.193 - -
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.321 0.101 0.458 0.808 156 55
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.185 0.109 0.212 0.315 157 16
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.166 0.110 0.255 0.560 83 25
36 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.909  0.141 0.074 0.146 0.449 198 60
37 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  1.931  0.102 0.066 0.135 0.336 122 24
38 Linux  0:00:00  1.931  0.285 0.115 0.629 1.002 282 105
39 Linux  0:00:00  6.008  0.273 0.006 0.229 0.480 180 45
40 Linux  0:44:59  16.873  0.118 0.010 0.491 0.522 1317 41
41 Linux  0:45:03  16.873  0.143 0.013 1.187 1.308 723 87
 

Report from 30-Mar-2015 09:36 till 31-Mar-2015 09:35

Generated on 31-Mar-2015 09:42

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.