Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 41 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.284 0.008 0.019 0.048 1678 49
2 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.106 0.011 1.169 1.278 771 85
3 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.161 0.015 0.188 0.188 - 0
4 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.081 0.016 0.033 0.050 516 9
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.211 0.023 0.049 0.135 610 52
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.154 0.026 0.053 0.053 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.097 0.039 0.078 0.078 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.243 0.058 0.116 0.118 1951 3
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.127 0.060 0.122 0.122 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.119 0.062 0.142 0.142 - 0
11 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.212 0.064 0.131 0.231 240 24
12 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.084 0.066 0.131 0.131 - 0
13 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.120 0.067 0.165 0.275 312 35
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.234 0.069 0.138 0.138 - -
15 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.057 0.070 0.137 0.137 - 0
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.113 0.070 0.168 0.168 - -
17 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.164 0.072 0.154 0.199 334 15
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.175 0.072 0.150 0.192 263 11
19 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.133 0.072 0.142 0.187 374 17
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.142 0.073 0.153 0.352 281 56
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.214 0.073 0.136 0.275 295 41
22 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.077 0.074 0.149 0.149 - 0
23 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.000  0.110 0.074 0.157 0.383 101 23
24 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.214 0.075 0.158 0.530 80 30
25 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.173 0.075 0.211 0.532 170 55
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.131 0.077 0.154 0.154 - 0
27 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.125 0.082 0.173 0.941 94 72
28 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.123 0.082 0.286 0.585 152 45
29 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.221 0.084 0.171 0.171 - 0
30 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.207 0.084 0.167 0.167 - -
31 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.392 0.089 0.400 0.639 88 21
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.269 0.098 0.586 1.036 231 104
33 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.148 0.103 0.759 1.086 200 65
34 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.129 0.107 0.213 0.213 - -
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.246 0.112 0.230 0.470 170 41
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.179 0.115 0.232 0.356 131 16
37 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.179 0.122 0.242 0.506 91 24
38 unknown  0:00:00  0.581  0.105 0.012 0.464 0.496 1265 41
39 unknown  0:00:00  0.694  0.076 0.014 0.186 0.187 3331 1
40 unknown  0:00:00  1.039  0.146 0.082 0.253 0.253 - 0
41 Linux  0:00:00  5.807  0.235 0.534 1.079 2.592 42 63
 

Report from 31-Oct-2014 09:35 till 1-Nov-2014 09:34

Generated on 1-Nov-2014 09:40

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.