Latest Performance News

Netcraft Hosting Provider Performance Monitoring

Netcraft measures and makes available the response times of leading hosting providers' sites. The performance measurements are made at fifteen minute intervals from separate points around the internet, and averages are calculated over the immediately preceding 24 hour period.

Hosting Providers sites ordered by failures over the last 1 day, updated every 15 mins. 42 sites
Click on a column heading to sort by that column, click twice to reverse order.
Click the site name to see graphs of site performance.
FAQ
Rank Performance graph Company site OS Outage hh:mm:ss Failed Req% DNS Connect First byte Total Kb/s size(K)
1 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.137 0.013 0.470 0.506 1150 41
2 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.316 0.016 0.029 0.067 1303 49
3 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.224 0.017 0.037 0.105 772 53
4 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.093 0.022 0.040 0.059 463 9
5 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.109 0.022 1.208 1.333 674 85
6 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.166 0.026 0.053 0.053 - 0
7 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.110 0.038 0.078 0.078 - 0
8 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.242 0.059 0.117 0.119 1717 3
9 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.155 0.063 0.145 0.145 - 0
10 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.205 0.064 0.127 0.263 299 41
11 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.108 0.064 0.131 0.131 - 0
12 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.201 0.065 0.131 0.177 207 9
13 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.130 0.068 0.137 0.181 381 17
14 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.180 0.071 0.154 0.200 327 15
15 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.111 0.073 0.158 0.274 297 35
16 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.185 0.073 0.152 0.196 254 11
17 FreeBSD  0:00:00  0.000  0.223 0.073 0.152 0.524 80 30
18 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.080 0.074 0.149 0.149 - 0
19 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.158 0.074 0.171 0.175 - -
20 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.272 0.075 0.147 0.147 - -
21 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.145 0.076 0.153 0.153 - 0
22 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.153 0.078 0.209 0.515 178 55
23 Windows Server 2012  0:00:00  0.000  0.070 0.079 0.147 0.147 - 0
24 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.172 0.081 0.254 0.254 - 0
25 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.231 0.083 0.574 1.871 49 64
26 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.192 0.085 0.169 0.169 - 0
27 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.329 0.090 0.380 0.652 79 21
28 Windows Server 2003  0:00:00  0.000  0.126 0.094 0.198 0.969 94 72
29 F5 BIG-IP  0:00:00  0.000  0.137 0.094 0.283 0.589 151 46
30 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.173 0.100 1.023 1.341 207 66
31 unknown  0:00:00  0.000  0.139 0.104 0.207 0.207 - -
32 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.305 0.108 0.347 0.839 212 104
33 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.243 0.113 0.227 0.462 173 41
34 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.185 0.122 0.246 0.521 87 24
35 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.201 0.147 0.300 0.736 152 66
36 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.218 0.154 0.308 0.468 101 16
37 Linux  0:00:00  0.000  0.222 0.260 0.345 0.349 - -
38 Linux  0:00:00  0.554  0.134 0.060 0.122 0.122 - 0
39 Windows Server 2008  0:00:00  0.557  0.101 0.075 0.155 0.384 100 23
40 Linux  0:00:00  0.665  0.125 0.008 0.166 0.166 - 0
41 unknown  0:00:00  1.000  0.111 0.020 0.206 0.207 1343 1
42 Linux  0:00:00  2.729  0.146 0.068 0.142 0.332 294 56
 

Report from 25-Oct-2014 02:35 till 26-Oct-2014 03:31

Generated on 26-Oct-2014 03:39

Note: Outage times display the minimum outage time which may understate each outage by up to 15 minutes, which is the sampling frequency.

If you are researching prospective hosting locations, or performing competitor analysis and would like to buy bespoke performance monitoring of sites of your choice, or access to historical data, please mail us at sales@netcraft.com

Interpreting the Tables

Using the performance of a hosting provider's own site to determine the performance of the hosting companies network, is only indicative. By default the sites are ranked in order of failed requests and time to connect, shortest first, in order to give the clearest indication of network capacity and congestion, with the least impact from the performance of the companies' own web servers, though it is possible to sort by any column by clicking on the column heading.

Presently our performance collectors are located at London/DXI Networks, New York/New York Internet, Pennsylvania/INetU-2, San Jose/Datapipe, Phoenix/GoDaddy, Italy/Aruba, Romania/Hostway, Zurich/Qube and Amsterdam/Webair. These companies have an advantage over the other companies listed in the table, as each of them have a collector in their own datacenter. Companies in the Far East are at a disadvantage as we do not currently have a performance collector in the region.

Companies using a caching system such as Akamai would have a particular advantage as the response to our request would come from the Akamai server closest to each performance collector.

If you are using the table as a guide when choosing where to locate a dedicated or collocated server, remember that connection times fluctuate continually, and only hundredths of a second separate the top companies. Avoiding companies showing prolonged outages is likely to be a better strategy than necessarily going for the company with the fastest connection time.

Other factors including availability and quality of support, and price will also be important. If you are considering shared hosting then the load on the shared hosting system will likely be a greater constraint on the performance of your site than network connection time.

More information can be found in the FAQ.